My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1989-03-07 Minutes
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
1989-03-07 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2010 10:46:19 AM
Creation date
1/5/2010 10:46:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P & Z Meeting Minutes <br /> Page 2 <br /> March 7, 1989 <br /> give his support, and to learn. He said that he may be <br /> interested in asking for a variance himself, in the future. <br /> The Commission and Mayor Haberman agreed that the addition would <br /> improve the property and the community. But, Chairperson <br /> Tourville stated that he can see nothing unique about the <br /> property and wonders if P & Z can justify the granting of a <br /> variance. <br /> Motion by Drilling, second by Vermeulen, to adjourn the hearing, <br /> motion carried unanimously. Hearing adjourned at 7:38 p.m. <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission of the City of Centerville held its regular meeting on <br /> Tuesday, March 7, 1989, at City Hall. Chairperson Tourville <br /> called the meeting to order at 7:39 p.m. Present: Vermeulen, <br /> Welk, Drilling and Council liaison, Mayor Haberman. Absent: <br /> Lindgren. <br /> Motion by Vermeulen, second by Welk, to approve the minutes of <br /> the February 7, 1989 meeting, motion carried unanimously. <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Discussion of Pole Building Ordinance concerns and <br /> recommendations. <br /> Mayor Haberman stated that Council member Peterson had made the <br /> statement that it may be best to not use "pole building" wording, <br /> as such; that it may be better to include specific structural <br /> design wording such as "Type V" instead. Haberman also noted <br /> that the Lino Lakes Building Design Ordinance was easier to <br /> understand and interpret than the sample submitted by the City <br /> Planner. <br /> Chairperson Tourville also prefers the Lino ordinance and stated <br /> that he feels the paragraph dealing with expansion of pole barns, <br /> which had previously been crossed out, should be left in. <br /> Motion by Vermeulen, second by Drilling, to recommend the City <br /> Council adopt the Lino Lakes Building Design ordinance, <br /> contingent upon the Building Inspector substituting appropriate <br /> wording to replace "pole -type building ", and contingent upon the <br /> section dealing with expansion of pole barns, which had <br /> previously been crossed out, being reinstated; motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.