My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1988-03-22 Minutes
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
1988-03-22 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2010 11:04:45 AM
Creation date
1/5/2010 11:04:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> P & Z Special Meeting Minutes <br /> Page <br /> 2 <br /> March 22, 1988 <br /> County roads will comply with County requirements. "Motion carried <br /> unanimously. <br /> Motion by Vermeulen, second by Welk to Table #2. House Size <br /> Changes, and #3. Attached Garages, until all Commission members <br /> are present, motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Tourville, second by Vermeulen for City Clerk to <br /> research and take appropriate action on LaMotte Drive /Mound Trail <br /> issue, motion carried unanimously. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Discussion of Moratorium on pole buildings. <br /> Motion by Welk, second by Vermeulen to send the following <br /> proposed amendment to Ordinance #44 to the City Attorney for his <br /> approval, and then make recommendation to the Council: <br /> After Section #5. Appeal Provisions., add: <br /> "Section #6. Variance Standards. Variances from the literal <br /> provisions of the ordinance may be granted in instances where <br /> their strict enforcement would cause undo hardship because of <br /> circumstances unique to the individual property under <br /> consideration. <br /> In considering all requests for variance or appeal and in taking <br /> subsequent action, the city shall make a finding of fact: <br /> (1) That the property in question can not be put to a <br /> reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the <br /> official controls. <br /> (2) That the plight of the land owner is due to <br /> circumstances unique to his property not created by the <br /> land owner. <br /> (3) That the hardship is not due to economic considerations <br /> alone and when a reasonable use for the property exists <br /> under the terms of the ordinance. <br /> (4) That granting the variance requested will not confer on <br /> the applicant any special privilege that would be <br /> denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or <br /> buildings in the same district. <br /> (5) That the proposed actions will not unreasonably <br /> diminish or impair established property values within <br /> the neighborhood. <br /> h <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.