Laserfiche WebLink
P &Z Meeting Minutes <br /> Page Three <br /> July 7, 1987 <br /> OLD BUSINESS <br /> Discussion of the request of Keith Kruger, 6719 Centerville Road <br /> to operate an auto repair shop at that location which is <br /> currently zoned rural residential. Mr. Kruger has not applied <br /> for his building permit to erect the building. <br /> Floyd Kruger, father of Keith Kruger, spoke to say that as none <br /> of the neighbors object to the proposed operation, he could not <br /> see why the Commission could not conform Ordinance #4 to suit <br /> Keith Kruger. <br /> The Commission agreed that they did not want to rezone that <br /> property at this time and they were hesitant to add to the list <br /> for Allowed Special Uses. It was suggested that the Commission <br /> look further into changing the home occupation portion of <br /> Ordinance #4. <br /> Motion by Buesseler, second by Kathy to table the request of <br /> Keith Kruger for an auto repair shop at 6719 Centerville Road, <br /> pending receipt of information from the League of Minnesota <br /> Cities of other city ordinances regarding home occupations, <br /> motion carried uananimously. <br /> Discussion of the L'Allier land swap to add Tract A: <br /> The North 16.5 feet of the East 159.00 feet of Lot 5, <br /> Block 2, L'Allier Estates, Anoka County, Minnesota; <br /> to Lot 4, Block 2 L'Allier Estates. To add: <br /> That part of Lot 9, Auditor's Subdivision number 47 <br /> (revised), laying Southerly of L'Allier Estates and <br /> laying Easterly of Southerly section of West line of <br /> L'Allier Estates, except the East 191.31 feet thereof <br /> subject to easement of REC; <br /> to Lot 5, Block 2 L'Allier Estates. <br /> The purpose of the swap was to correct setback violation for a <br /> garage that was built from a Centerville building permit and <br /> erected on the lot line. <br /> Motion by Buesseler, second by Welk to grant Ralph L'Allier, <br /> representative of L'Allier Estates, a variance to Ordinance #8, <br /> section 21.05 for the land swap of the above discussed <br /> properties, motion carried uananimously. <br /> Justification for this variance: <br /> 1. does not interfere with the purpose of the subdivision <br /> regulations in Ordinance #8, <br /> 2. lot size and set back requirements are met, <br /> 3. the variance would correct an existing problem (garage <br /> on lot line), <br /> 4. variance results in a more reasonable use of the land <br />