Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. March questioned if Ground Development was open to the City requiring a minimum size for <br /> garages within the development. Mr. Hannah stated that Ground Development was open to all <br /> suggestions from the City. <br /> Commission Member DeVine stated an interest in reviewing the elevations for the lots to determine <br /> what type of buildings the lots would accommodate. <br /> Mr. March stated the City is looking for higher valued homes to balance out the housing stock in the <br /> community, as there are currently a high number of entry-level homes. Mr. Hannah agreed and stated it <br /> is the preference of Ground Development to build as many full basement homes as possible to increase <br /> home values. <br /> Commission Member Brainard state he would like to see the development come to Centerville. <br /> Mr. March stated he preferred Ground Development's design concept to the design previously submitted <br /> by Gor -Em. <br /> Commission Member DeVine questioned whether Mr. Palzer had any questions or concerns. Mr. Palzer <br /> stated that he had concerns regarding the cul -de -sac to the northwest of the development not meeting the <br /> lots to the north. Mr. Palzer also stated that the same lots may be large enough to be divided in the <br /> future and there is a potential that they may be assessed double sewer and water assessments. Mr. Sterm <br /> noted he would check to see if they were large enough to be subdivided. <br /> Mr. March expressed a concern for Lots 1 through 7 of Block 3 due to the fact that Dupre Road runs <br /> behind the lots and there would be no privacy in the back of those lots. Mr. Sterm stated that something <br /> different could be done if it is the desire of the City with those lots such as leaving it a natural wetland. <br /> IV. OLD BUSINESS <br /> 1. Hasaik Variance Request <br /> Commission Member DeVine questioned if the Hasaiks would need a variance to do the interior work if <br /> the building were not non - conforming. Mr. March said there would not be a requirement for a variance, <br /> but a building permit would still need to be obtained. <br /> Commission Member DeVine stated he would recommend partially approving the variance to allow for <br /> the interior modifications provided the proper permits and inspections were obtained. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned Mr. Palzer whether sheet rocking the interior of the pole <br /> barn would fall under the definition of "expanding the use" of the building. Mr. Palzer stated it was his <br /> interpretation that sheet rocking the interior of the building intensified the use of a pole building and that <br /> is the reason a stop order was placed on the improvements. <br /> Commission Member Kilian questioned whether all the interior improvements would need to be <br /> removed for the inspection. Mr. Palzer stated he would visually inspect the improvements prior to the <br /> official building inspection to ascertain which items needed to be removed prior to the official <br /> inspection. <br /> Page 8of13 <br />