Laserfiche WebLink
existing, non - conforming use, once stubs are to a lot and a resident would have to <br /> • hook up within one year to sanitary sewer. He noted water would not have to be <br /> hooked up until the well system fails. <br /> Council Member Travis asked why the developer was not responsible for 53% of <br /> the total project cost. Mr. Peterson stated the developer should not have to be <br /> responsible for trunk fees along the park or for the $35,000 fee to extend City <br /> trunk sewer. <br /> Council Member Travis questioned who would be responsible for future <br /> extensions to the water and sewer to the south. Mr. Peterson stated future <br /> developers and properties to the south would be responsible for these fees. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers stated Mr. Vanderbeek's property is a <br /> concern at this time due to the proportion of value added versus the amount of his <br /> assessment. She explained this lot could only be subdivided into two lots and this <br /> Iot could only sell for roughly $40,000 which would only cover the cost of his <br /> assessment to one lot. <br /> Council Member Nelson asked who would be responsible for paying an <br /> assessment if a petition was approved by a Judge in court. Mr. Peterson noted the <br /> City would be responsible for paying the assessment through the general fund. <br /> Mr. Carlson stated he would schedule a meeting with Mr. Vanderbeek to discuss <br /> the current assessment and if the fee could be negotiated. <br /> Mr. Vanderbeek asked if the water line could be brought down the entire east side <br /> of the roadway. Mr. Peterson stated this could be possible to allow for a better <br /> stub location on the Vanderbeke property. <br /> Mayor Wilharber asked if both pipelines could be placed on the west side of the <br /> roadway. Mr. Peterson stated the west side of the roadway is extremely tight and <br /> the directional jackings were more expensive than the directional borings for <br /> service stubs. <br /> Motion by Council Member Sweeney. seconded by Council Member Nelson <br /> to accept the Preliminary Report and Authorize the Plans and Specifications <br /> for Hunter's Crossing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mayor Wilharber indicated that Mr. Vanderbeek presented the Council with a <br /> written statement to contest the assessment for his property. <br /> Overweight Permit — WB Miller <br /> Mayor Wilharber read through the permit request and stated the overweight <br /> permit request was needed for LaMotte Drive. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers asked which roadways would be traveled for <br /> this construction. Council Member Sweeney stated this permit would be hauling <br /> from Heritage Street and LaMotte Drive to LaMotte Park. He explained the <br /> 7 <br />