My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-09-02 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2003
>
2003-09-02 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2007 9:26:17 AM
Creation date
1/17/2006 3:51:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning & Zoning Connnission <br />September 2, 2003 <br />Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />3. Sedona Homes Variance Request (7035 20th Avenue) <br /> <br />Chair Hanson opened the public hearing at 6:36 p.m. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked if Staff had taken a look at another development built by Sedona <br />Homes and the parking lot situation. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff had toured <br />another development and the lot was 2/3 full. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked how many parking spaces that development had compared to the <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Kel1ier, Sedona Homes, addressed the Commission and explained that the <br />development toured is 17 units with 131 total parking spaces. He then said that the <br />square footage of that development is approximately 2,576 and the one proposed for <br />Centerville is 2,400. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the parking lot requirements and determined that it was <br />appropriate to use the ground floor square footage when determining the parking lot <br />requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber asked what would be on the second floor. Mr. Kel1ier indicated <br />the second floor is 1200 square feet for a second story of the main floor office not <br />residential housing. <br /> <br />The Commission agreed that no variance for the parking lot is needed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kilian questioned whether the City needed to account for the upper floor <br />square footage for parking spaces. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed it but determined, due to ADA requirements, that there would <br />not be office space on the second floor and that it does not warrant parking spaces for that <br />upper floor square footage. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked if the outlot is to be wild or mowed grass. Mr. Kel1ier indicated the <br />area is a drainage and utility easement. He then said it would be left as wild grass and not <br />maintained because there are times when it is wet but said the landscaping would <br />continue to the edge with trees planted to provide a screen between the building and the <br />pond. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson expressed concern with drainage and discussed with the developer the <br />elevations of the property and whether there is potential for water runoff to adjoining <br />parcels. Mr. Kel1ier indicated that the site would be graded according to the requirements <br />and a holding pond created on site. <br /> <br />Chair Hanson asked if the developer discussed a dual entrance with the County. Mr. <br />Kel1ier indicated he had asked them but was told no so he plans to have a wider entrance <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.