2001-09-04 P & Z - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

noted that City Code requires that accessory structures be constructed in the rear yard which eliminates the line of sight issue. Mr. Tratar indicated he questions how all the properties that already have a garage were able to build them without following the 35-foot setback. He then stated some of the garages were constructed during the last 8 to 10 years and asked how that was allowed. Mr. Tratar stated that he feels the 35-foot setback is excessive. Commissioner DeVine asked if the Commission saw a legitimate reason why the Ordinance could not be changed. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the addition to the Ordinance was made to protect line of sight. She then indicated that the other structures were either built without permission or the Ordinance was different at that time and they are considered nonconforming structures. Mr. Tratar indicated he did not feel line of sight would be compromised if he were allowed to build his garage. He then asked who decided on the 35 feet and questioned whether it is a legitimate concern. Chairperson Hanson indicated that the City feels line of sight is very important to public safety. He then noted the Commission was willing to review it but was not prepared to make a decision at this point. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers explained that if Mr. Tratar applied for a variance and did not meet the variance requirements his request would be denied and he would lose his money. She then indicated that not a lot of variances are granted and the process is designed to be tough. She then suggested waiting for the Commission to review the Ordinance to determine whether or not it needs to be changed. Commissioner Brainard stated that, in his opinion, variances are supposed to be rare and few. He then noted a lot of cities have failed to make residents meet the requirements as set by the state but said Centerville is trying to require residents to meet those state requirements. 3.Mr. Bart Rehbein, Revised Concept Plan – 1475 Mound Trail Mr. Rehbein of 1659 Lakeland Circle addressed the Commission and indicated that Anoka County had denied his request for access onto Main Street and had revoked the right to use the existing driveway access. He further stated that Anoka County has plans to seek funding in 2005 to widen Main Street to a four-lane highway and, as part of that, the County would need to obtain another 27 feet of right of way. He then noted that he was told since the County is planning for a wider faster roadway through Centerville they want to limit as much access as possible. Page 10 of 16