Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> I <br /> E-Mailed to Council on 5/3/O1 at 11:34 am. <br /> Aprii 25, 2001 Council Minutes <br /> Council Member Nelson questioned the requirements for pools if the current Ordinance <br /> #4 does not cover pools. Mr. March explained that Staff has interpreted that pools fall <br /> under the definition of Accessory Structure and, therefore, pools are limited to two <br /> percent (2%) of the rear yard similar to that of a shed. <br /> Council Member Nelson questioned the appropriateness of a Variance in this case. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers explained that would not work due to time <br /> constraints and the requirement of holding a public hearing. <br /> Council Member Capra stated that Council usually approves the recommendation of the <br /> Planning and Zoning Commission. However, she would prefer a telephone poll <br /> following the meeting. <br /> Mayor Swedberg questioned whether Ms. Peil has contacted other construction firms to <br /> construct the pool. Ms. Peil stated that she had and that no other contractors were <br /> available prior to August. <br /> Mr. Hoeft suggested that Council either attend the Planning and Zoning Commission <br /> meeting, call a special meeting or have a telephone poll following the meeting. <br /> Mayor Swedberg questioned what would happen if someone raised major concerns about <br /> pools at the public hearing. Mr. Hoeft stated that there could be a possibility of that <br /> happening and suggested calling a special meeting following the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission meeting prior to releasing the permit. Mr. March stated that he did not <br /> believe the public hearing would be of interest to very many people. <br /> Motion bv Council Member Nelson, seconded by Council Member Capra to <br /> schedule a special meeting of the City Council on Mav 1, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. All in <br /> favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> None. <br /> VIII. OLD BUSINESS <br /> Mr. March stated that Staff had located the actual bid for Hunter's Crossing that listed <br /> four (4) alternates. Mr. March stated that the City chose Northdale Construction, which <br /> had the highest cost for the alternates and that may be the reason the project was not <br /> awarded. Mr. March stated that Mr. Peterson had indicated in a letter that funding should <br /> be discussed rior to a rovin an alternate. Mr. March also stated that at the time the <br /> P PP g <br /> bid was awarded, no commitment had been received from The County Bank. <br /> Mr. March submitted copies of the building permit plans that show an "X" where the <br /> requested hydrant was drawn on same by the Centennial Fire District. Mr. March stated <br /> Page 4 of 12 <br />