Laserfiche WebLink
Council Liaison Broussard Vickers then summarized the issues raised concerning the <br /> preliminary plat. Those issues are: The driveway crossing property of the current <br /> Townhome Association and concern for more detail for the buffering that will take place <br /> in the development. She then e�plained that the City has not gotten into a position of <br /> requiring exact details regarding the construction of the buildings as was suggested by a <br /> resident. <br /> Mrs. Albrecht stated they have no idea what the buildings will look like and said she is <br /> concemed that she will have to pay to maintain and repair Ojibway Drive after the <br /> construction truck traffic and the addition of twenty (20) more homes. She then noted <br /> she did not think it was fair to her Association, as construction trucks tear up roads. <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers questioned whether the residents were interested in <br /> e�cpanding their .Association to include the new townhomes, if the City does not make the <br /> street public. <br /> Ms. Peterson e�lained the by-laws of the Association specify 18 units. Council Lia.ison <br /> Broussard Vickers explained that the byla.ws could be amended if the Association chose <br /> to do so. She then asked ifthe residents were fine with the basic design for the ! <br /> townhomes. <br /> Mr. Albrecht questioned if there was an alternative plan tha.t the developer could come up <br /> with. Mr. Quigley stated he was at the meeting to seek input and take it back for <br /> consideration. <br /> � <br /> Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated she would like to review the Association by- <br /> laws. She then noted the plan was in the preliminary stages and agreed that the City � <br /> needed to review the road issue. <br /> Mr. Norm Freeberg, 7025 Dupre Road, asked if the new development would ha.ve silt <br /> barriers included. He noted that the developer dumped ten (10) loads of dirt right next to <br /> his townhome. He feels about one load a week goes into the sewer which runs into the <br /> lake. He feels this should not be allowed. He noted there is mud running everywhere <br /> and asked how the developer is allowed to get by without providing silt fencing. He <br /> understands that the trucks have to get in and out of the area, but those trucks are <br /> dragging the dirt and mud into the streets. He thinks they or the developer should have to <br /> clean up the mess, not the City. <br /> Council Member Broussard Vickers e�lained t�at silt fencing was not a part of <br /> Developer's Agreements at that time, but is required in a11 new Developer's Agreements. <br /> Mr. Quigley explained that all the silt fence requirements were met during the time of <br /> construction. He then noted Centerville does not require silt fencing arowad the building <br /> site. Mr. March e�lained the City requires, in new subdivisions, barrier around the curb <br /> and river rock where the driveway would be. He then noted it is a constant problem <br /> trying to get developers to clean up after their subcontractors. <br /> Page5of12 <br />