1999-03-03 Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Maria Haugen (1994 73rd) suggested Mr. Drilling consider a log/wooded building front. Ms. Gai1 Nadon (1984 73r Avenue) suggested the roof pitch vary and building front be based on each operating business. Mr. Wayne LeBlanc (1677 Peltier Lake Drive) stated he is pleased that the Council is enforcing the Design Team building design idea. Mayor Wilharber suggested the building design be specifically incorporated into the building development agreement/SUP. Mr. Hoeft suggested Mr. Drilling return to the council with amendments incorporated into his plan. Mr. March suggested the day care facility colors differ from the other business stalls, and that Mr. Drilling return to the Council with shingles, siding material and actual color schemes. Motion by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Brenner to have the Special Use Permit include an 8' fence, with greenery, a sidewalk, lighting, and that the building have a historicallook. Motion carried unarumously. Rezone Request - R& R Leasing - Mr. Gerald Rehbein Mr. Rehbein presented a 16-unit town home sub-division. The proposed sub-division is a 3:1, units to acres. Mr. Dale Runkle (Bright Keys Development) gave an overview of the proposed Bright Keys town home development. The homes will range from $120,000 -$160,000; 1220 - 1700 sq. ft. Mr. Travis questioned the possibility to restrict the development to persons over the age of 55 yeaxs of age. Mr. Runkle didn't see that as a viable option. Mr. Rodney Henslin (1967 72st) commented that the plan is too density for 5.6 acres. Mr. Travis corrected Mr. Henslin that the parcel is a 10 acre site. Mr. Henslin cammented that the development is not conducive to the surrounding property. Mr. Henslin felt snow plowing will be a concern. Mr Palzer commented the snow can be removed from the site. Mr. Henslin felt the access onto and off 20 Avenue is inadequate and possibly hazardous, too. Councilmember Travis stated that he liked the idea; however the proposed development appeared too dense. Mr. Henslin commented the proposal doesn't comply with the minimal requirements and the neighbors believe the adjacent property owners will experience a decrease in property value. Ms. Denise Saxton (1949 72st) requested the Council consider that the adjacent property owners understood the north property is reserved for executive homes, not town homes. Councilmember Brenner questioned if a rezone is required with a PUD (Planned Unit Development}. Mr. March and Mr. Hoeft were unsure. Mayor Wilharber complemented the adjacent property owners for the time invested to complete the informational handout. However, the comprehensive plan states the property as RS executive homes. Also, the City of Lino Lakes comprehensive plan indicated high density west of 20th Avenue. Council members Brenner and Travis liked the proposal, but felt it was too dense. Motion by Councilmember Sweeney, seconded by Councilmember Nelson accept the Planning and Page 4 of 7