My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-26 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2010
>
2010-05-26 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2010 4:26:36 PM
Creation date
5/21/2010 3:40:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 12, 2010 <br />He added he believes there is enough money left in the fund to perhaps cover the damage, <br />though he personally feels the contractor should bear a large amount of the cost. <br />The Councilmembers discussed their concerns including the benefit the contractor gained <br />by using this road as a staging area, the annoyance to the residents as they were not <br />technically a part of the project, that there is partial cost responsibility of the City and <br />residents as well as the majority of the cost being the responsibility of the contractor. <br />The City Engineer's options of road repair were also discussed with the agreement being <br />a mill and overlay repair needs to be done. It was the consensus of the Council to <br />approve a mill and overlay repair and to direct Staff to speak with the contractor and <br />report back to Council with a recommendation. <br />Motion by Council Member Lovc seconded by Council Member Paar to <br />move forward with mill and overlav of the entire cul- de-sac as presented by the Citv <br />Enuineer and to direct Staff to contact contractor and bring recommendation back <br />to City Council. <br />Councilmember Paar stated he would also like the City Engineer to include in his <br />conversation with the contractor, the benefit that the contractor gained while using this <br />area, as well as the Council's concern against just patching the road, which would be less <br />cost effective in the future. <br />All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br />Councilmember Broussard Vickers asked those residents in attendance, by a show of <br />hands, in the event of an agreement with the contractor, which of them would be <br />agreeable to split the cost of a mill and overlay with 75% (contractor) cost, 25% (City) <br />cost, and the residents would pay 25% of the City's 25 %. <br />All those residents in the audience were agreeable. <br />VIII. NEW BUSINESS <br />I. Resolution #10 -OXX — Authorizing Proiect, Proiect Funding Plan & Loan <br />Between Funds — Downtown Stormwater / Field Irrigation Proiect - $110,000 <br />City Administrator Larson stated Staff is currently in the process of obtaining additional <br />background information and recommended City Council table this issue. <br />Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Paar to <br />Table Resolution #10-OXX — Authorizing Proiect, Proiect Funding Plan & Loan <br />Between Funds — Downtown Stormwater / Field Irrigation Proiect - $110,000. All in <br />favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br />2. Ordinance #35, Second Series — Amendment to Chapter 111 Liquor Regulations <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.