Laserfiche WebLink
3-4 days while Mr. Griffith asked for 1 week. Mr. Watson: indicated he supports.short term delay but after 2 years we <br />need to go :forward andit's good document which also needs recognition: Mr. Bosak supported the document. Mr. <br />Schilling asked if a 30: day delay is problematic. Mr. Watson. requested we provide reasonable time: for submission of <br />change requests by the next planning. commission:meeting. Asked ifredline versions were available, Clerk Magnuson <br />indicated he had a box full present. Attorney Newcome indicated friendly amendments could be considered by the City <br />Council and.that the matter does not need to go back to the Planning Commission but that their comments would be <br />relevant. Mayor .Emeott suggested utilization of the 18 July 2006 workshop to review amendments, Mr. Watson <br />suggested return replies. by Tuesday, 27 June 2006, for the. July. Planning. Commission it would Work. Mr. Griffith <br />indicated he can work in Word Perfect and could respond to: an electronic version in the time. frame: noted. Mr. Lindner <br />asked the Planning. Commission be changed to Monday, 10 July 2006 and duly noticed. RESOLVED:. Motion by <br />Watson, second by Schilling to table consideration of Resolution No. 2006-20 to July was unanimously. approved by <br />a roll call. vote. <br />Mayor Emeott proposed combining the Zoning and Subdivision ordinances to createa single land use document, <br />stating it's done in other cities. Mayor .Emeott asked Mr. Griffith who responded Bloomington already does this as a land <br />development package. Mr. Magnuson asked Mr_ Newcome'ifan additional public hearing is necessary. Mr. Emeott asked <br />thatthe matter be tabled to "follow consideration of Ordinance No. 43H. <br />Mr. Magnuson presented Ramsey County's request that. we. enter into an agreement forDispatch Services in <br />recognition of the new dispatch center scheduled to go online_ While we are currently paying for dispatch services <br />through the contract cities agreement, accounting changes for all have been made. and adjustments to reflect. <br />RESOLVED: Motion by Watson, second by Rasmussen to adopt Resolution No. 2006-21 was unanimously approved. <br />Mr. Magnuson reported that the Ramsey County Sheriffhas been successful in utilizing Administrative Offenses <br />ordinances andis seeking support of the City of Gem Lake to develop a consistent, common languageordinance for the <br />contract cities to enforce. The code could be amended to reflect additional needs of the. cities.. Magnuson explained the <br />process as presented. RESOLVED: Motion by Schilling, second by Bosak to support developmentof an administrative <br />offenses ordinance in conceit with the contract cities group was unanimously approved. <br />RESOLVED: Motion by Rasmussen,. second by Schilling.to hire an intern, First choice is Valerie Gross, <br />Mr, Magnuson introduced the problem with fees. charged bySEH. for the Highway 61/County Road E.engineering. <br />He then asked Mr. Higgins. to explain. Mr. Higgins. spoke regarding engineering cost:overruns on the Highway 61 / <br />County Road E: cooperative agreement project_ Mr. Emeott asked if the project will be completed this year and was <br />advised it is about to start Mr. Watson asked if.RamseyCounty. and Vadnais Heights have approved the increase and <br />Ramsey County has. with Vadnais Heights expected to tomorrow. Mr. Magnuson also noted that Mr. Soler has agreed <br />in principal that if.Ramsey County is able to access any "Unweave The Weave" funds for the project, he will dispense <br />those back to Gem ]rake and Vadnais Heights, RESOLVED: Motion .by .Bosak, second by Rasmussen to approve an <br />amendment to the Cooperative Agreement with Vadnais 1-leights and .Ramsey County for sharing of cost overruns for <br />engineering on the Highway 6I / County Road E. project with Gem Lake's share at $8,.337 or 21%. of the overrun <br />(VadnaisHeights share at$8,337 or 21 % of the overran and Ramsey County at $23,026.or 58% of the cost overrun) was <br />unanimously approved. <br />In the absence ofa motion, consideration .of the MN Association of Small Cities membership was not considered. <br />Mr.. Schilling. spoke in regard to the workshop scheduled for 18 July 2006 indicating it was intended: to have the 2 <br />finalist developers present themselvea to a combined planning commission, city council, stakeholder and public forum <br />to facilitate the decision making process. No owner meetings have yet been scheduled butMayor Emeott encouraged. <br />their invitation to the workshop. <br />Mr. Magnuson then asked ifthe.July meeting could be rescheduled to 24 July to accommodate conflicts..with his <br />schedule. While Mr. Bosak will not beavailable, all others present agreedtoreschedule the July meeting to24 July 2006. <br />Mr. Watson reported that DeputyDari Ruettiman recommends a letter go out to the community announcing that we <br />want a neighborhood watch program. We. also need a meeting location, an insert to Ramsey County as web link, and a <br />map (possibly produced bySteve Hack 651-765-2912). Per Mayor Enteott, we need to.fund theeffort. Costs will include <br />maps, a mailing and a meeting place. Mayor Emeott mentioned the golfcourse; the. Montessori and fields as. possibilities. <br />RESOLVED: Motion by Emeott, .second by: Watson. to approve $500: for the Neighborhood Watch program was <br />unanimously approved. <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />