Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF GEM LAKE <br />MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />24 JULY 2006 <br />The July, 2006 regular meeting of the City. Council of the City of Gem Lake was called to order by Mayor Emeott <br />on. Monday, 24 July 2006 at 7;06 PM in the first floor meeting room of Tousley Ford. Mayor Emeott, Councilors <br />Rasmussen, Schilling and Watson. Also present were City .Clerk Magnuson, City EngineerHiggins, Jim Lindner and. <br />Craig Rafferty of the Planning: Commission, Mark Sweet of the Business Development Committee. Others in attendance <br />included: Al Sclitiber, George Junguiann, Gretchen Artig-Swomley, Dale .Swomley,Ken .Kirchoff, Cheryl Kirchoff; Jinn <br />Kohler, Mary Janssen, DanJanssen, Patrick Kelly,Dave Ramberg, Bryan Hansen, Connie,Kunin,.Linda Hoeschler, Gord <br />Kordosky, Robert Uzpen; .Kim Anderson-UTzpen, Jay Bazooband, Debra. Larsen, Roger Anderson,: Ric Rosow, Jim <br />McNulty, and Bryan Harjes. Mayer Emeott thanked those inattendance for corning. <br />Following Mayor .Emeott's request for additions, deletions, or corrections,the following actions were taken: 1) <br />unanimous approval of the 19 June 2006 Minutes of the City Council Meetingas amended on Motion by Rasmussen, <br />Second. by Schilling; 2) unanimous approval of the 24 July 2006 Agenda of the City Councilmeeting as amended. on <br />Motion. by Watson, Second by Rasmussen. <br />Mayor Emeott then opened a duly noticed public hearing, noting that the hearing is a supplemental hearing to <br />discuss changes in anticipated costs based upon residents requests for changes discussed at the fist public hearing and <br />additional findings by the engineers for Public Improvement Project No. 2006-0 (road improvements). Dr. Anderson- <br />Uzpen asked about additional areas to be replaced arid: Mr. Higginsresponded additional findings of subsurface problems <br />were uncovered. Mr: Jungmann asked if the outfall at Haven Lane would be rebuilt - no. Mr, Kordosky asked if tree <br />removal has been included - yes: Ms. Larsen asked about sloppy snow plowing and whether we would recapture costs <br />from snow plowing - will attempt. Mr. Uzpen asked if rolled edges would again be used - yes, but not full. curbingas <br />pricing is substantial. Mr. Schriber re asphalt plowed onto his property. Dr. Andersen -liven asked if a guaranteed <br />maximum was in place - Mr. Higgins explained the public bidding process. Discussion of installation of snow plow <br />stakes. Mr. Schriber iindicatedhe had incurred damage to his sprinkler system.. Discussion of cost of curbing at $5.00 <br />per: foot. Discussion of cost increases followed_ Mr_ Schriber wants to see the bids - bid totals were read. The public <br />hearing portion of the meeting was closed at 7:20. <br />RESOLVED: Motion by Schilling, second by Watson to adopt Resolution No. 2006-16 was unanimously <br />approved. Work will begin to meet the completiondate of 31. August2006. <br />Report an bonds and bond:sale by Mr. Magnuson to request continuation to 31 July 2006. <br />Discussion by Mayor Emeott regarding combining Ordinances No, 43H and 58.0 into a single ordinance to further <br />.facilitate ]and development in the City of Gem Lake. The new ordinance will be known as the. Gem Lake Land Use And <br />Development Ordinance.. Also this will be more convenient for the City. RESOLVED: Motion by Rasmussen, second <br />by Schilling to adopt Resolution No..:2006-24 providing for the subdivision ordinance and thezoning.Ordinance to be <br />combined into a single ordinance to be known as the Gem Lake Land Use And Development Ordinance was <br />unanimously approved_ <br />Mr. Schilling, reported on the activities of the Economic Development Committee (Mark Sweet and Hutch <br />Schilling), reporting on the 18 July 2006 meeting with potential Hoffman. Corner's developers and the 20 July 2006 <br />Neighborhood Advisory Group. Meeting with. Hartford indicating a committee wil I be.formed to represent the residents_ <br />Mayor Emeott introduced Ordinance No. 4311, indicating had.been postponed to provide Mr. McNulty <br />and the Builders Association counsel an opportunity to respond with recommendations for change. Following their. <br />submissions and review by Mayor Emeott and Mr. Lindner, Interim Planning Committee Chairman; Mayor Emeott <br />prepared a.report which was distributed to the parties identified. Mayor Etneott then. noted the. need to complete the <br />amendments to the zoning ordinance: to appropriately plan for future. needs of the coniniunityand provide.a long .term. <br />document requiring only minor changes. Mr. Rosow was recognized, discussing changes proposed and. feels Hillary <br />Farm should be exempted permanently froth changes..as the changes negatively impact: Hillary Farm..Mayor Emeott <br />noted changes would be primarily for the benefit of a single development and not general changes, noting. changes. <br />requested worked primarily for Hillary Farm. Mr..Rosow:again spoke of many meeting and asked .for further extension <br />of exemptions. Mayor Emeott referred to houses that have deferred to the new regulations and their success_ Mr_ Watson . <br />said he .understood .Hillary Farm would .be okay with further extensions and.are changes better for hint or the whole <br />community. Mr. McNulty said that most of the time: the last two years dealt with Hillary Farms. and to ignore.their <br />recommendations does not make sense: Mr: Watson asked .if Mr. McNultyobjected:to the entire ordinance or portions <br />of the ordinance to which Mr McNnIty...ansWered portions. Discussion of how changes .impact. other zoning districts <br />Page 1 of 29 <br />