2006 07-24 CC MINUTES - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

versus. RI. Mr. Rosow commented on impact to zoning districts and that.they weretrying to address their own needs. Mayor Emeott .commented on his concern that many proposed changes related solely to new development and net redevelopment. Mr. Rosow then. spoke to dedication of property and set back/openspace as a problem. Mayor Emeott then addressed the. issue. referencing White .Bear Township models reviewed. Mr. Rosow said we should not simply adopt something because White Bear. Township or others nearby have adopted'that thing and asked if Bryan Harjes and Roger Anderson could present. their arguments relative to negative impact ofchanges. Mr. Magnuson. asked Mr. Rosow if this presentation has to do with set backs in the NPDES section to wit he answered yes. Mr. Magnuson stated he .understood that the City has agreed in principleto exempt permanently those sections related to the storn°twater portion. as the subdivision was previously approved without these sections. Mr..Rosow confirmed Mr. Magnuson's comments: Mr. Magnuson referred Mr. Resew to Mr. Newcome for language developnient.of the exemptions. Mr: Watson proposed the City extend Resolution No. 2006-23 from.one year to three years exemption for Hillary Farm and asked Mr. Rosow if that would be: acceptable. Mr. Rosow responded yes he thinks so. Mr. Watson stated the Citywants to assist Hillary • Farm to. be successful Mr. Schilling stated we are addressing issues not previously addressed... Mr. Rasmussen also supported Mr_ Schilling's statements regarding the changes proposed. RESOLVED: Motion by Watson, second by Rasmussen to amend Resolution No..2006-23 so as to further extend the exemption of .Hillary Farm from proposed changes to. the zoning ordinance for a period of three (3) years total in addition to. the two years. provided by state statutes. RESOLVED:: Motion byschilling; second by Rasmussen to adopt Resolution No..2006-20 was, following discussion of height with Mr. Raf ertyandMr.:Lindner, unanimously.approved_ RESOLVED: Motion by Bosak, second. by Rasmussen to approve summary publication of Ordinance No. 43H and to place both printed and electronic copies on file with the Ramsey County Libraryin. Wbite:Bear Lake. Mayor Erneott then introduced for consideration the (proposed) Park Land Dedication amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Magnuson reported that a duly noticed public hearing on 10 July 2006 was convened to receive .publie comment on the. addition of the. (proposed) Park Land Dedication amendment to • the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Magnuson noted the wide spread use.of this vehicle to support parks,: trails and 'open. spaces. Mr. Magnuson explained the. intentat ten percent of the .land or pre -development cost of land and how language was developed. Mayor Emeott reported that a quorum was not present at the public hearing so the report is offered to. the City Council without. the. recommendation of the Planning Commission: Mr. Emeott then reported on changes to state statutes regarding. the three. necessary elements to approve. such an amendment: A park and trail plan in the.. Comprehensive Municipal Plan, estimated cost in the capital plan including parks and trails, a separate account to manage the fimds and confirmed we have all three requirements_ Mayor Emeott explained how charitable gambling funds. were deposited in the fund to establish same. Mr: Uzpen then spoke to. the maximum amount to be ordered to which Mr. Magnuson responded that ten. percent is an unopposed. amount typically while 1argerpercentages usually draw both attention and opposition. Mr_. Kelly confirmed ten.percent isthe generally accepted practice and larger percentages draw attention as unjustillable. Ms. Larsen. asked if we have a committee to develop parks to which Mayor Emeott responded that we will seek to appoint •a Park Commission in the near future. RESOLVED: Motion by Watson,. second by Schilling to adopt Resolution No: 2006-22 was unanimously approved_ Mayor Emeott reported on Mr. Bosak's recommendation of Mr. Ryan Green to redevelop our website at a cost of $ 1,200 and $50.00 per month for maintenance. Mr: Watson. said that the internet website is an excellent addition for forms and information and links for other information including. the Neighborhood Watch Program. Our neighboring communities have excellent interactive.websites and ours needs improvements_ Ms. Larsen asked about maintenance .and Mr_ Schilling indicated it was part of the proposal and his monthly fee is very inexpensive.. Mayor Etneottreported that the current budget supports this development. RESOLVED: Motion by Schilling, second byRasmussento approve. Ryan Green as website designer and approve an expenditure of $1.,200 for development and $50 per .month for maintenance Was unanitnouslyapproved. Mayor Emeott then explained the. need .for additional meeting tittle to deal with many ofthe issues facing the City. Rather than call special meetings, it was suggestedthat a workshop be established. for discussion of issues Facing the City. Mr. Watson supported the idea as did Mr. Rasamsson. Mr. Magnuson supported establishing a regular meeting time convenient to the Council rather than publishing. each meeting. Mr. Schilling then spoke supporting the need for more meetings. Mr. Watson indicated we have at leastsix months of needs. currently and supports.the monthly workshop. The location will be set based upon discussion with others. Discussion ofpublic open meeting followed with Mayor Emeott stating that meetings by email were .also. not allowed. Ms. Larsen spoke regarding the workshops. Mr.. Magnuson indicated the website could be used to accept suggestions. Mr. Sweet spoke regarding committee.participation atthe. • workshops. RESOLVED: Motion by Watson, second Schilling to approve the addition of monthlywOrksImpStothe City Council meeting schedule commencing.on 14 August 2006 and then in September on the first Monday of each. month and on the day immediately .following. if the day falls an a designated holiday was unanimously approved. Mayor Emeott than discussed the use of Consent Agenda. Mr. Magnuson reported that Consent Agendas contain routine and non -controversial issues and typically historicreports of events that have already happened. They are used extensively to streamline meetings and aresupported by the League of MN Cities. Ifthere its an objection, one items can Page 2 of 29