Laserfiche WebLink
Revenues for 2009 for the first three quarters are slightly above 2008 for the same <br />period which is directly related to timing and activity in building related activities. <br />Expenditures for the year are below budget as shown below; <br />2009 2009.°Io <br />Budget YTD 3rd QTR (YTD) Spent <br />General Government $ 251,80O $ 268,329 165.29°A <br />Public Safety 82,975 80,967 97.58% <br />Pubic Works 52,238 11,768 22.33% <br />Total Expenditures $ 387,013 $ 361,064 93.30% <br />5500,000 # - <br />i <br />$450,000 <br />$400,000 - <br />$350,000 {•... <br />$300,000 : i• .. <br />$250,000 1- <br />i <br />$200,000 - <br />$150,000 4- <br />$100,000 <br />$50.000 <br />JAN,1 JAN_ <br />2009 EXPENDITURES: BUDGETED COMPARED TO ACTUAL <br />FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN- <br />JUL. AUG. SEP, OCT. NOV. <br />x-08BUDGET -0-08ACTUAL, <br />DEC. <br />If expenditures were spent evenly throughout the year the City should have spent 75% <br />of its budget. The City has spent 93.30% of their anticipated budget for the first three <br />quarters of 2009. The reason for this is due partly to the fact that the transfers to other <br />funds are budgeted in January; however the actual transfers took place mid -year. There <br />are activities that appear to be over and under budget, but it is due in part to the cyclical <br />nature of some of the activities. The bottom line is the City has spent only 54.22%.of its <br />total 2009 budget without including the additional $100,000 transfer to the Sewer Fund. <br />