Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF GEM LAKE, MINNESOTA 4 <br />SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS: AND RESPONSES (CONTINUED) <br />YEAR ENDED DECEMBER.31, 2016 <br />OTHER. ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION -- MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />2016-003: Prompt Payment of Local Government Bills <br />Criteria: Minnesota Statute §471.425 Subd. 2., requires Cities. to pay each vendor obligation according <br />to terms of the contractor, if no contract terms apply, within the standard. payment period unless the <br />municipality in good faith disputes the obligation. For municipalities who have governing boards which <br />have regularly scheduled meetings at .least once a ninth, the standard payment period. is defined. as <br />with in. 35 days of the date of receipt. <br />Condition: The City paid one invoice outside of the 35 days as defined by the Minnesota Statue. The <br />invoice was paid .approximately 3 months after it was dated. <br />Effect:. The City is not in compliance with the Minnesota Statute requiring prompt payment of local <br />government bills. <br />Cause: The Citypayed jhvoice outside of the 35 days as defined by the Minnesota Statue. <br />Recommendation: We recommend City management. closely monitor payment of invoice to ensure. <br />that they. are paid: in a timely manner.. <br />Management Response:. <br />City management is aware of this requirement and will continue to monitor the requirement to ensure. <br />that payment continue to be made as required. <br />2016-64.4:.Annual Report of Outstanding Obligations <br />Criteria: Minnesota Statute §471.70, on or before February 1st each year, it shall. be the duty of the <br />principal. accounting officer of each municipality to report to the auditor of each county in which such <br />municipality is situate, the total amount of outstanding obligations, and the purpose for which issued as. <br />of December 31 of the preceding year, <br />Condition: The City did not. submit to Ramsey County the Outstanding Obligations as of February 1 <br />2017.. It was submitted on February 9, 2017: <br />Effect: The City is: not in compliance with the Minnesota Statute requiring the submittal of the <br />Outstanding Obligations as of February 1 of each year. <br />Cause: The City has provided the Outstanding Obligations report in the past but did not submit report <br />by the deadline for 2016. <br />Recommendation: We recommend City management implement a process to trigger the submission <br />of -the Outstanding Obligations report prior to the February 1 deadline each year. <br />Management Response: <br />City management is aware of this requirement and will continue to monitor the requirement to ensure <br />the. Outstanding Obligations report is submitted prior to the deadline. <br />(38) <br />