My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1994 06-20 CCP
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
1990 - 1999
>
1994
>
1994 06-20 CCP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2026 8:59:47 AM
Creation date
6/19/2019 8:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 00500
Document
AGENDA PACKET CITY COUNCIL
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
-r-Prav5E111 <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />3535 VADNAIS CENTER ORIvE, 200 SEH CENTER ST PAUL, MN 55 i 10 812 490.2000 800 325.2055 <br />ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL • TRANSPORTATION • <br />Gerry Urban, City Administrator, City of Vadnais Height <br />Cindy Gray, AICP <br />Transportation Planner <br />lIgCI]NIG <br />{ MAY 1 9 1994 <br />May 19,.1.994 <br />Fontana Square proposal, Traffic Impact Study and Site Plan Review <br />Over the past few months, we have been included in the City's process of site plan and traffic <br />study reviews necessary to address the proposed Fontana Square development. We began our <br />analysis with a significant amount of familiarity with the area and the intersections being studied <br />as a result of previous County Road E corridor studies which we conducted for the City of <br />Vadnais Heights. <br />As with similar studies which we conduct for other communities, our analysis is carried out with <br />the objective of providing the City staff, commissions and councils with the traffic information <br />needed to assist in the decision making process. We prefer to provide a somewhat conservative <br />(worst case) analysis, as in the case of both the. County Road E Corridor Study and the. I-35E <br />Corridor Study, which both assumed full development of buildable properties within a 20 to 25 <br />year timeframe. <br />Now that a specific proposal is before the City, our role has taken on more of a review function. <br />This requires that we review and respond to the developer's site plan and traffic impact study, <br />relate these to our past analyses, and provide guidanceto the developer as to what consists of <br />an appropriate, accurate and complete study. <br />Furthermore, as with any city staff, it is generally our role to provide the developer's traffic <br />engineer with the results of prior analyses in the area, as well as with the assumptions that were <br />used in those analyses. In this situation, it is then up to the developer's traffic engineers to <br />decide if they agree with the prior assumptions. If the developer disagrees with our <br />assumptions or the results of our analyses, it is up to them to prove or justify otherwise. <br />In light of this background information, this memo is to summarize the following, <br />Our previous findings on the County Road E Corridor Study and the I-35E study, <br />• Results of the 1996traffic forecastand analysis provided for Fontana Square by <br />BIKO Associates, <br />Level of Service information <br />SHORT ELLIOTT. Proposed site access <br />HEtVRICKSONINC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST CLOUD. MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON• WI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.