My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015 Vol. 9 Issue 3 May
GemLake
>
ADMINISTRATION
>
NEWSLETTERS
>
2015
>
2015 Vol. 9 Issue 3 May
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2025 8:57:26 AM
Creation date
11/26/2025 8:57:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 04500
Document
NEWSLETTER
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Gem Lake News Page 2 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />The next step was to authorize a feasibility study <br />of the whole idea. Supplying municipal water to <br />the Gem Lake business district turned out to be <br />not only feasible, it is necessary to the area's <br />long-term growth and public safety, according to <br />the recent feasibility study completed by Short <br />Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) for the City of Gem <br />Lake. The study was authorized by the city <br />council on November 18 of last year, and was <br />meant to be a first step in the process of deciding <br />if, and how, a municipal water project would get <br />off the ground. <br /> <br />Most municipalities contemplating an expansion <br />of municipal services, such as water, begin the <br />process with a feasibility study. SEH began by <br />looking at Gem Lake's previous Water Study, <br />which was done in 2006. This earlier study <br />identified three options for where water would be <br />piped in from the City of White Bear, but <br />recommended the best site as County Road E, at <br />the railroad crossing. <br /> <br />The County Road E option was the <br />recommended option in the 2006 study due to its <br />proximity to the initial anticipated service area, <br />Hoffman's Corner and the city's desire to use <br />White Bear's city water, due to its chemistry and <br />make up. <br /> <br />Another recommendation in the current feasibility <br />study is to create an additional emergency <br />connection to the Gem Lake water system. This is <br />due to the fact that the initial system would be a <br />dead end main, supplying a limited area, rather <br />than a more conventional "looped" system. <br />The connection of water on County Road E <br />presents challenges in engineering, due primarily <br />to the railroad bed that would have to be crossed. <br /> <br />The cost of the connection would be <br />approximately $274,000. (This is much less than <br />originally estimated.) The drop in price happened <br />because of the railroad has agreed to consider a <br />less expensive way for the work to be done. This <br />would involve temporarily suspending rail traffic <br />while the tracks are taken up, the pipe is laid and <br />the tracks put back in place. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Gem Lake Water Project: Time Line Discussed <br /> (continued from page 1) <br /> <br /> <br />The estimated cost of the emergency loop <br />would be about $160,000, bringing the total <br />project cost to about $434,000. <br /> <br />Timeline Explained at Meeting on May 14 <br />At the neighborhood meeting on May 14, a <br />more detailed time-line for the project will be <br />handed out and explained. Many of the steps <br />involve frequent opportunities for public input <br />and comment. <br /> <br />For instance, it will be proposed that an <br />Improvement Hearing is held in mid-June, so <br />interested persons can voice questions and <br />concerns about proposed assessments that <br />would be made of property owners in the <br />affected area. <br /> <br />In June or July the council could ask that <br />formal plans and specifications for the project <br />are drawn up. Following this, another <br />neighborhood meeting would probably be held <br />to present final detailed plans and final <br />projected costs. <br /> <br />If all goes as planned, the council would <br />approve the project plans and advertise for <br />bids for the construction project. <br /> <br />It is thought that the bids would be accepted <br />and late August, then an assessment hearing <br />would be held, probably in September. <br />Assessment amounts would take into account <br />the percentage of the serviced area that each <br />property owner has and independent <br />appraisals done by a third party as to how <br />much the improvement would add to the value <br />of that property. <br /> <br />If all is still a go, construction would take place <br />in the October and November and would <br />possibly go into next Spring. There are many <br />steps involved in bringing additional municipal <br />services to property owner, and a number of <br />these steps are required by state law. Your <br />input will be vital. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.