Laserfiche WebLink
The multi decade projectsucceeded in creating almost.10 million new irrigated acres, leading to thriving cotton <br />and rice production. Butthe impact on the Aral.Sea was. ..unimag1nable. The fake started shrinking in the 196.0s <br />and has since lost 90 percent of its surface area and 96 percent -of its volume. Water levels have dropped by .9.3 <br />vertical feet28 Bustling lakeside fishing vilIages became ghost towns whose city docks now overlook sprawling <br />deserts dotted with abandoned fishing boats; the coastline, Fong -since receded beyond the horizon, is often.miles <br />and rriiles.away.z9 <br />The words and actions.of U.S. political leaders through the years have caused significant concern among citizens <br />and governors of Great Lakes states: According -to a 2001 Associated Press article, for example,. President George <br />W. Bush said he wanted "to talk to Canadian Prime.Minister Jean Chretien about.piping [Great Lakes] water to <br />parched :states in the -west and southwest." Seven years. later, New Mexico. Gov. BiII:Richard.s.on, them running.for <br />the Democratic presidential nomination against Barack.Obama, told the Las Vegas Sun he favored a "national <br />water policy," noting thatt"states like Wisconsin are awash in water."30 But the abiding example of the Aral Sea <br />has perhaps done as much as anything to galvanize protective sent! men ts.among citizens and leaders !n the <br />Great Lakes region. As Peter Anin notes in his excellent book The: Great Lakes. Water Wars, "the Aral Sea disaster <br />has been invoked repeatedly by. Great Lakes environmentalists as an ecological rallying cry: an example of what <br />not to become," <br />Nonetheless, there have been many attempted large-scale diversions of Great. Lakes water over the years --some. <br />successful, others not. Perhaps.the.most: prominent ongoing .diversion.from the Great Lakes is the Illinois <br />diversion (also known as the.Chicago River diversion), constructed in the.late 19th century,.M.Chicago.was <br />transformed from a frontier town to a major city, the Chicago River, which flowed into. Lake Michigan, became <br />increasingly polluted with raw sewage and industrial. wastewater that threatened to foul-the:city's freshwater <br />intake from Lake Michigan. The,city conceived a bold plan. By constructing.a.canaI connecting the Chicago River <br />to the Des Plaines River,. they couId.reverse the flow of the Chicago River. Instead of the Chicago River flowing into <br />Lake Michigan, Lake Michigan would flow into the Chicago River, merging with the river and diluting its pollution <br />before flowing through the canal to the. Des. Plaines : River and eventually entering: the Mississippi River just north <br />of St. Lou is..31 <br />After lawsuits.by the city of St. Louis —which, as.you might imagine, was not happy about the diversion —and <br />other Great Lake states.(concerned aboutthe.potential lowering of lake.levels by as much as six inches), and after <br />several. Supreme Court opinions,. a couple.of acts .of Congress, and a consent.decree, the: diversion was:a.pproved <br />and continues in place.to this day. <br />Water flowing out of the Great Lakes Basin via the.Chicago. River diversion is more than offset by two <br />diversions into.the Great Lakes, from Long Lac and.the.Okogi Riven in northern.0ntario. These diversions, <br />completed in 1941 and 1943 respectively, both redirect water that would have flowed north to.James Bay to <br />south -flowing rivers. that eventually reach Lake. Su east.ofThurider Bay, Ontario.32 The goal of these <br />diversions was:to increase the flow of water Into and through the Great Lakes to. increase Canadian hydro. <br />capacity to power the manufacture of. criticaI materials for fighting World War II. <br />While the Chicago, Long Lake, and Okogi. River diversions constituted impressive, large-scale engineering <br />accomplishments, they would have.been significantly overshadowed byseverai.gargantuan water.divers.lons <br />involving.the Great Lakes.that were proposed, but never undertaken,. in the 20th century. For sheer audacity, <br />none tops the Great Recycling and Northern Development (GRAND) Canal of North America, the brainchild of a <br />Newfoundland engineer named Thomas Ki.erans whose goal was nothing less than to ensure. a eel iable. supply of <br />fresh water for the entire continent. Kierans proposed constructing an enormous dike that would separate Jaynes <br />Bay from Hudson. Bay, everituaIlytu.rningJames Bay into a giant freshwater lake. Through a. see! es of nuclear <br />reactors and hydro darns, water 'in the newly .des.alinated James Bay would then be pumped to the:Great Lakes <br />and from there to the U.S. Midwest, South, Southwest, and even to Mexico.33 <br />