My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023 11-21 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2020 - 2026
>
2023
>
2023 11-21 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 2:12:11 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 1:58:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 05000
Document
CITY COUNCIL PACKET
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Garbage & Refuse Ordinance Page 2 November 21, 2023 <br />Gem Lake City Council <br />Of the residential respondents, five had their services paid by their Hc..rd6owrier's Association. Table 2 <br />summarizes the approximate monthly rates for each hauler. Overall, a plurality of resident responses noted rates <br />of approArnately $25.00 -; $49:99 per month. Prices varied for responders who have Republic or Waste <br />Management, while Gene's was under $50 in the responses received by the city, <br />Table 2: Monthly rate, by hauler <br />Waste Management <br />Re yblic:5ervices <br />Gene's Disposal. Services <br />Total <br />Association <br />5 <br />19% <br />1 <br />4% <br />0 <br />-. <br />& <br />9% <br />Paid <br />$0.00-..$24.99 <br />3 <br />12% <br />5 <br />19% <br />7 <br />50% <br />15 <br />23%. <br />$25.00 - <br />10 <br />38%Q <br />7 <br />27% <br />7 <br />50% <br />24 <br />36%. <br />$49.99. <br />$50.00 - <br />2 <br />$%a <br />6 <br />23°]o <br />0 <br />- <br />$ <br />12% <br />$74.99. <br />$75,00 - <br />3 <br />12% <br />0 <br />- <br />0 <br />- <br />3 <br />5% <br />$99:9:9 <br />$100.00 - <br />2 <br />8% <br />3 <br />12% <br />0' <br />$124.99 <br />$125.00 - <br />0 <br />- <br />3 <br />12%... <br />0 <br />- <br />3. <br />5% <br />$149.99 <br />$.150.00. plus <br />1 <br />4%n <br />1 <br />.4% <br />0 <br />- <br />2 <br />3% <br />In terms of whether the city should. contract with a hauler for services, resident responses showed a split opinion. <br />Respondents were almost evehly split between 'Yes' (47%and Vo' (44%a); with a small number responding as <br />'Indifferent' (9%). <br />Seventeen comments were received from residential respondents. Mostcomments noted. supporting the city <br />contracting for hauling services, only if prices would stay consistent or go down. <br />Commercial Responses <br />Of the businesses who responded, five different garbage haulers provide. services:. Waste Management (serves <br />four respondents), Gene'.s.(three), Walter's Recycling &Refuse (two), RoadRunner.(one);.and Nitti Sanitation <br />(one). Responders were: sati - sfied with their services, as 64% reported being 'somewhat. satisfied% and 36% were <br />'extremely satisfied'.. <br />Monthly rates did not vary as much for businesses compared to residential.respondents. Nine of the. business. <br />respondents reported a rate of $150 or more. The Montessori School reported a rate of between. $50. and. $74.99 <br />with RoadRunner, while.another business responded that. their rate was $100 — $124.99 a. month with Waste <br />Management. <br />Unlike residential responses, ten of the eleven businesses who responded were not interested in the city <br />contracting for garbage hauling. One was `indifferent' to.the idea; they commented they would support the city <br />contracting for hauling services if the city can get a better price. No other comments were received from business <br />respondents. <br />NEXT STEPS <br />Given the. split in opinion, the commissioners want to forward the information to the City Council to see what. <br />direction the Council would Iike to move in with regards to contracting for hauling services, The commission can <br />review other changes to make to Ordinance 45 in the meantime... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.