Laserfiche WebLink
Luther Cadillac Project Staff Report April 12, 2022 <br />Gem Lake Planning Commission Page 7 <br />Section 17.5.9(cy <br />1) Shall rnajntain.harmony and compatibility with surrounding uses and with the architectural <br />character and design standards of existing uses and development; <br />The site is unique in that a majority of the site is not within the city limits; there are no buildings or <br />structures within the Gem Lake side that would add or subtract from the aesthetics of the .area. <br />Since the site is within the gateway zone, the commission could request additional landscaping or <br />screening. if there. isconcerns with the. parking lot being.compatible with the properties to the. <br />north. <br />2) Shall meet or exceed all Performance Standardscontain elsewhere in this Ordinance,. <br />The proposed use is meeting applicable.zoning requirements: <br />3) Shall not generate such additional traffic associated with the use that would overburden or <br />exceed the capabilities of streets and other public services and facilities including, but not lunited. <br />to, parks,. schools, and utilities serving the area. <br />The proposed. development would not be generating traffic to a level that wo:uI-d overburden <br />streets or other pubIiic services and utilities. <br />Variance criteria: <br />Practical Difficulties,. per Section 17,41: <br />The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by <br />the zoning. ordinance <br />The request is to have a zero foot.setback, in order to permit a parking lotto extend over two <br />parcels that .are under the same ownership: Due to the. lots being in different municipalities., <br />the. two lots. are unable to be combined... Without a variance, the parking lot. would. need to <br />maintain a setback from the. property line. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the <br />landowner <br />The municipal boundary, not created by the land owner,. prevents the parcel from being <br />combined with the other parcels under the same ownership <br />The variance, if granted, will not alterthe essentlal character of the locality <br />It will be unlikely that passersby will be aware of the municipal boundary in this area, which <br />creates the need to keep the`property line -and triggered theneed for a Setback,. Reducing :the <br />setback along the south property Iine.to zero feet for the parking. tot would allow the site to <br />appear andfunction as one development, and does not appear to have an impact to the <br />character of.adjacent areas within the city. <br />Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties <br />The practical difficulty:is due to the location of the municipal boundary preventing theparcels <br />from being.combined; economic considerations .ate not rioted as a practical:difficulty. <br />Practical difficulties include, but are not: limited to, inadequate access to directsunJight.for <br />solar energy systems - <br />NIA <br />9 <br />