Laserfiche WebLink
;em Fake Hy-Vee C�Store Traffic Impact Study Review <br />ugust 8, 2018 <br />aae 2 <br />d. Movement deficiencies (LOS F) are. not reported. The appendix Info includes the following <br />.changes. In .LOS which need to be addressed since they appear attributable to the development. <br />is Full 2025 Nursery <br />1. TH 5.1/CR E <br />a. AM Peak <br />€,. NB Left goes from E to F <br />b, PM Peak <br />1. SB Left goes from E to F <br />€[. V4 Intersection 2025w€th Nursery <br />i 1. TH 811CR E <br />a: AM Peak <br />i €. EB Thru goes from E to F <br />U. WB Left goes from E to F <br />5. Traffic Forecasts <br />a. The 0.2°/a annual growth rate does not correspond to.a projection factor of 1.0 which is 0.06/o <br />annual growth:. However, using the 0.2% annual growth dries not impact the: rasults, as it is not <br />I more than. would actually. be used in rounding .the traffic.volurrles.. <br />6. Trip Distribution <br />a. Provide an explanation as to. how the.percentages were determined. <br />b. It is difficult to determine how the exciting site traffic tits with these percentages. <br />7; Trip Generatlon <br />a. The reportdescribes the use of the ITE Trip Generation Manual P and 10111 editions. it appears <br />that the.:10{h..edition is what is. used. <br />b. The .101h edition has the category used in the report 9.45 — Gaso€ine/Servict3 Station wl <br />Convenience. Market. It appears more appropriate to use 853 - Convenience Market with <br />i Gasoline Pumps. This category has significantly more data points. In either case the report.used ' <br />fueling positions to determine the number of trips. If SF is used for 945,`the trips are significantly <br />than what the report uses. Both rneasures are used in 853; the trips are higher and <br />relatively close together, but again higher than the report. <br />C: It appears that the 1 €{SF made -to -order dining area should Nava trips generated on. its own, <br />sincethis could be a specific destination. <br />d: Shopping Center <br />' I. How was 30 ksf size ar4ved at? <br />I€. AM rate does not..appear reailstio, particularly with a 7,15 — 8:.1.5..AM peak Harr. <br />�. 8, Pass -Sy Trips <br />a. By definition,. pass -by trips would be those from traffic.on Hoffman Road, Traffic from TH 51 and <br />j CR E would be diverted trips, but essentially with the same Impact. Haw.ever, It appears: the. <br />II reported number of pass -by trips have been totaliy deducted from the site access. These <br />i rerotitod trips still need to -access the. site. When camparing:Figures 3, 6R-and T the site entering <br />and .exiting traffic: in the. AM Peak Hour is 52 and 50 respectively and the .PM Peak. Flour is 55.and <br />53 respectively, A'figure should be created. showing the pass -by trips. <br />b. It appears that the Date. used forthe Coffee/Donut Shop is.high (841%), since the. ITE reported data <br />does not have any inside seating. The reported percentage is also daily and not peak hour. We <br />assume that there Is inside seating based on the proposed use of a dining area. Based on the <br />site having seating a lower pass -by rate appears appropriate. Suggest it is better based on <br />category 934 -- Fast Food Restaurant with Drive -Through Window (50%). <br />9: Turn. Lane Analysis <br />a. The report assumes that a right.turn lane approaching Hoffman Load would. need to be <br />accomplished in the. existing street width.. A lane could be constructed with additional right -of --way <br />i with.no impact to the existing thru lanes. <br />t§ <br />aSrjlglgamlklumrionSt159p7 hy-reelgase-perry faka•hyras ff801 i 0, dacx <br />4. <br />I <br />