My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022 08-08 CC PACKET
GemLake
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
PACKETS
>
2020 - 2026
>
2022
>
2022 08-08 CC PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 8:17:23 AM
Creation date
1/8/2026 8:11:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Code
ADM 05000
Document
CITY COUNCIL PACKETS
Destruction
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Q19. Does the new Minn-esota legal ca:nnabin.o.id law <br />change anyth .ng about how we do. drug testing for <br />CDL holders' <br />A14..No, cities with :positions requiring an.employee M hold a commercial driver's license <br />(CDL) will recall these positions .are*regulated by federal Iaw, .and those regulations are <br />supervised -by the Federal:Departrrient of Transportation (D.O.T). Federal law preempts state law <br />related to cannabinoid use; in fact the DOT states in its DOT recreational Marijuana Notice it <br />does not authorize the Use-:nfSchedule I drugs, including marijixaria, for any reason. As .s result, <br />cities should continue to follow their drug -testing procedures related to -CDT holders and. may <br />enforce prohibitions agaiin_d any use of cannabinoids.for CDLholders, regardless of:state.law <br />protections. <br />Although there is a legal.difference. between marijuana and hemp, DOT warns CDL drivers the <br />hemp products -could lead to a positive marijuana test; therefore CDL holders are ultimately <br />responsible *ifthose products lead to a positive marijuana test. <br />Cities can find more information cin.the effects of tj.e new law on drug testing in the LMC Drug <br />and Alcohol Testing Toolltit,:starting on page. 22. <br />Q20. Does the new law change anything related to <br />employees who carry a firearm? <br />t, A20. No. Public safety employees who carry a firearm cannoTIAW'fully Use marijuana. under <br />federal law. Federal lave pr0hibits.ci0es from providing firearms or ammunition to an employee <br />it knows or has reason to think:ia using marijuana.:Although there is a.legal difference, between <br />marijuana products. and hemp praducts,-itis the. understanding of LMC ihatit may nofbe <br />possible to differentiate the products in a drug test. Officers shp4ld be mindf d pf any substance <br />they ingest because they are ultimately responsible if those. products lead to a positive <br />marijuana test. <br />Q21. Are there now *"*acceptable" limits .of <br />cannabinoids for non-C.DL employees for purposes of <br />d*r.u.g test ng at. work (i.e., those we test u n d e r state <br />drug and alcohol testing law)? <br />A2I. There;isn't a.clear answer, since THC can -remain in the body -for several weeks after usage <br />(arid long after any intoxicating or impairing effects have since disappeared),. so positive. test. <br />results may not indicate any wrongdoing on. the employee's part andmay just be evidence.of an <br />employee's lawful -actions done outside of work. The League:of*Minnesota Cities recommends_ <br />that employers thoroughly document any suspicions of an employee being under the influence <br />and to work. closely with their city attorney(s) before taking any action against the.employee. <br />Wlth:this new area of law, a city may want to avoid relying on the results of traditional tests. that <br />detect -metabolites remaining in a person's body (for many days or weeks *after using marauana) <br />and instead f6cus on implementing reasonable -suspicion drug -testing protocols to detect.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.