Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Although there are many homes that may not be hooked up, for <br />instance, to water because they have a well or something, <br />we would still either have the water services extended out <br />or, to the best of our knowledge, in these particular streets, <br />the services are already out there. The people may not be <br />hooked up, but the services are out past the pavement so that <br />they could hook up without tearing them up. We also work <br />with NSP and the telephone company to have them inspect their <br />lines and do any repairs that they feel are necessary to <br />their own lines, prior to the pavement being put down. We <br />try to coordinate that with them so that it happens when the <br />roadway is torn up, before the curb and gutter and the new <br />roadway is put down. I wish I could tell you that you're <br />going to go through ten years and never see a hole put in by <br />any utility work, but there's no way I can do that. We do <br />try and take at least reasonable efforts to make sure that <br />we don't put a new road in and then turn right around and <br />tear it up with routine work. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: He mentioned televising the <br />situation. I think that means running a television ,camera <br />down through the pipe into the ground, doesn't it Charlie? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Yes. We actually put a small television <br />unit down the manhole, run it through the sanitary sewer, <br />and take pictures - at least see the picture as we go - of <br />what the sewer looks like from inside, trying to find out if <br />there are any broken pieces, large cracks, etc. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: Okay, let's get on with the <br />hearings then. Mr. Popovich, would you discuss the <br />financing aspects. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, as to <br />this particular project, it was petitioned for by 80% of <br />the people. The total published cost is $65,265.18. If it <br />were assessed 100%, the cost per front foot, based on the <br />front and side assessment as indicated by the 'engineer, <br />would be $46.63. Because the Council has a policy of 25% <br />being assessed, it would amount to approximately $11.65 a <br />front foot for this particular project. It is anticipated <br />that the work would be done this summer and there are other <br />projects and improvements on the schedule tonight, but there <br />are three others that could De merged with this one - they're <br />in the general neighborhood - and become a consolidated <br />improvement. All of them could be - if things go right - <br />finished this summer. Whether or not we'd have an assessment <br />hearing this fall will be determined by how fast construction <br />goes. If we could have assessment hearings this fall, then <br />assessments will begin to be collected with taxes commencing <br />in 1984. If it has to be delayed one year, then they would <br />be commencing in 1985, with our assessment hearing in the <br />late fall or early fall of 1984. <br /> <br />-5- <br />