Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MR. JOHN MILLER, 2716 Farrington Street: I'm reasonably <br />happy with paying the personal assessment to get that <br />improvement in appearance and a better quality road, but I <br />really don't understand the value to the City government, or <br />the public in general, of making the change. I wonder if <br />somebody could cite any changes that are beneficial to the <br />public in general - somebody from the City. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I can certainly make a pass at that at <br />least. Many of the people that drive on these roadways donlt <br />necessarily live on the roadway. If they're going to another <br />road further up - it's part of the overall transportation <br />system of the City. It's felt that many times an improvement <br />like this has an overall benefit to the neighborhood in <br />general. In other words, the value to your property - if <br />you live along the specific improvement - hopefully goes up. <br />That's the whole plan behind this. It's part of the benefit <br />you receive by being along this street. It's also thought <br />that the overall worth of the City - or the benefit to the <br />whole neighborhood - also goes up. We in the Public Works <br />Department also anticipate that maintenance costs are going <br />to go down, which are paid for by everyone in the C~ty, and <br />it's going to be an easier road to maintain in the future. <br />It will have proper curbs and gutters to carry the storm <br />water away, it will have better crowns, better slopes, and <br />have a better pavement condition that should require less <br />pothole patching - sealing of joints, etc. Overall, we feel <br />there is a benefit to the entire community. How one wants <br />to exactly divide that benefit up - 40% on this street, 20% <br />on the next, etc. - obviously is open to each person's <br />interpretation. It's been the City policy that it would be <br />25% assessed to the adjacent property owners and the <br />remaining 75% is a benefit to the community as a whole. I <br />hope that clears it up a little. <br /> <br />MR. MILLER: Can you explain your procedure to make <br />sure that no new holes will be dug withing a year or two. <br />There are several homes that I know of where they have not <br />yet connected to some of the facilities. I'm ~oncerned <br />about what you're going to do about that. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: In case anyone couldn't hear - the ques- <br />tion was, what about those parcels that don't already have <br />connections to sanitary sewer and water. How can we avoid <br />having this nice brand new road - if it gets put in - torn <br />up six months later by someone digging out in the street. <br />Unfortunately, we can never guarantee that that's going to <br />happen because breaks happen, leaks happen, etc. One of the <br />things we do on our City utilities, for instance - we <br />televise all the sanitary sewers prior to the work being <br />done to make sure that we can locate what we hope will be <br />the bad location. We then correct those at the time the <br />street is torn up so that wouldn't have to be done. If <br />there are homes that do not have sanitary sewer and water <br />services extended out past where the roadway work would be - <br />toward the home - we install those at the same time. <br /> <br />-4 - <br />