My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2011 1:26:38 PM
Creation date
8/5/2011 1:26:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 18,2011 <br /> Page 21 <br /> Mayor Roe questioned if parking was allowed within that area; with Mr. Paschke <br /> responding negatively. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Pust; that this was not <br /> a green plan and provided nothing new; and in fact, opined that the Master Plan <br /> provided a better plan in terms of impervious surface, with more regulation, rather <br /> than relying on verbal authority versus the vision the public wanted. Council- <br /> member McGehee noted the vigorous discussion at the Planning Commission lev- <br /> el on the build-to line; and questioned whether this Plan represented what resi- <br /> dents really wanted. Councilmember McGehee opined that Langton Lake was a <br /> wonderful amenity and that the proposed greenways were not spelled out well <br /> enough; and questioned what access Mr. Lamb had to the AUAR during this <br /> process. <br /> Mr. Lamb noted that he was aware of the limit of allowable square footage as de- <br /> fined by the AUAR, and that it had been a reference document throughout the <br /> process, and provided broad linear frontages for the entire area. Mr. Lamb ad- <br /> dressed multiple story structures and their relationship to frontages that could or <br /> could not be delivered; with the Plan focused more on the defined physical rela- <br /> tionship with the lake and building lots to accommodate connections around <br /> Langton Lake. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that without height restrictions in this area, it <br /> could look like downtown Chicago with the proposed frontages. Councilmember <br /> McGehee noted that there is a greenway throughout the entire area, but focused <br /> all right around the Lake, and questioned where the connectivity was along Coun- <br /> ty Road C in the vicinity of the medical building and adjacent parcels. Since <br /> County Road C is considered the City's Gateway, Councilmember McGehee sug- <br /> gested a nice path along that boulevard, but questioned how to get there. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee questioned how the proposed boulevard area between the <br /> build-to line could accommodate a healthy tree; and questioned where green <br /> space improvements were evidenced. <br /> Mr. Lamb noted that Prior and Arthur had portions of sidewalk on both sides; but <br /> how to connect with the existing network was still pending; along with Twin <br /> Lakes Parkway, the east side of Mount Ridge; and other existing public amenities <br /> that do not currently connect to the Lake itself. Mr. Lamb noted that one feature <br /> of the Regulating Plan at this time is how to take existing pathways and connect <br /> them to Langton Lake. <br /> Councilmember Pust questioned the accuracy of Area A on the Regulating Map, <br /> designated as greenway in relationship to Areas C and D, unless at the corner of <br /> Arthur and Iona; opining that it appeared that urban frontage was held on a few <br /> corners, with flexible frontage ringing most parcels, depending on their owner- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.