My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7490
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:28 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7490
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-23 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
3/14/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. HONCHELL: No, I'm not saying you'd be charged for it. <br />I'm just saying (inaudible). <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor, you can do it if you don't assess <br />any portion of it, because it wasn't included in the general <br />description of the project. None of it can go against the <br />apartments, because we are assessing part. You can put it in <br />if you pay it all out of MSA funds - that's what I'm saying - <br />if the state will go along with it. But the way the project <br />is engineered at this point - it's not part of the description <br />of what's going to be done in there. You can augment it as <br />long as you don't assess. If you determine to assess, then we <br />have to give notice over again. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: <br />here, how would it be <br />abutting the curb, or <br />some distance? <br /> <br />If a sidewalk was to be provided along <br />put in? Three feet wide, directly <br />would it be set back from the right-of-way <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: A routine sidewalk construction - it would <br />be a lot like some of you have seen over on Western, just south <br />of County Road C. That is five feet wide and it's u~ually one <br />foot from the property line, the property line being your <br />property line - the edge of the right-of-way - which in this <br />case would be 33 feet from the centerline. That's your property <br />line. It would be a fair distance away from the proposed curb. <br />If the curb is 17 feet away - it's about ten feet from the curb <br />routinely. <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: In other words, the middle of my front <br />yard. <br /> <br />MR. LYMAN DALE: I heard it was a freebie on the state - <br />if there's such a thing. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I want to say that you're a man after my <br />own heart. I ran in 1971 favoring sidewalks on where County <br />Road C-2 was at that point - it's an MSA road - so I'm all for <br />you. <br /> <br />MRS. MARION LUNZER: "It might save somebody's life. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: Let me ask a question - how many <br />people here are interested in the C-2 project? How many of <br />you would favor a sidewalk on the south side of the street? <br /> <br />MAN IN AUDIENCE: The majority of our driveways are on <br />the north side. (Inaudible) mailboxes and no parking are all <br />on the south side, so it would be logical for the north side <br />to be a sidewalk. That's where the big boulevard is. <br /> <br />ACTING MAYOR JOHNSON: I will suggest a procedure. We <br />will send a questionnaire out to the people on C-2 and if 50% <br />of the people say they are in favor of the sidewalk on the <br />south side of the street, we'll put it in. We can take that <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.