My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7499
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7400
>
res_7499
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:17:34 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7499
Resolution Title
Rescinding Resolution No. 7489 Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-83-3
Resolution Date Passed
4/11/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />able to once - after 24 years - bring my yard down to where it <br />matches the street. We hope that we can have this improvement <br />as nine out of ten of us - without benefit of petitions - have <br />been able to accomplish. We think that as long term residents - <br />we came here hoping to make this our home for the rest of our <br />lives and we hope to do it. I would hope - before I pass this <br />earthly vail - that I will see a decent curb and gutter on our <br />street. I thank you. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Is there anyone else? <br /> <br />MRS. SANDY KING, 2835 Galtier: I was the petitioner on <br />this matter. I am a little bit upset at the moment because <br />of a few things that were said. whoever said that I contacted <br />them three times - I wish they would notify me. I did not <br />contact anybody if they told me no. There was no pressure. <br />I think I was invited into two or three homes. One couple <br />asked me in - I was there for about a half an hour - and they <br />asked me more questions than I really could answer. They <br />did sign the petition - decided they were in favor of it. I <br />didn't pressure anybody - if anyone says I did, I wish they'd <br />speak with me because if someone said no to me, I left. <br />That's all there was to it. I did contact, I think, a couple <br />of people twice only because I did not hear back from them <br />and I just wondered if they cared to indicate one way or the <br />other. That was the only time I did contact someone more than <br />once. As far as telling somebody it would cost $600.00 - <br />under oath I did not. I was told by the City Engineer - had <br />it on paper - that the cost would vary, that an average cost <br />is $12.00 to $15.00 a foot, that the last couple of years have <br />been lower but there's no guarantee. I said an average cost <br />is $800 to $1,000 - it could be lower if the prices have been <br />comparable to the last few years - but I said there is no way <br />of guaranteeing that. I have counted the potholes on our <br />street - if you divide our block into half - the south end <br />and the north end - there is one pothole in the south end, <br />there are nine potholes in the north end - and they were <br />filled the other day. But there are nine of them there. I <br />counted them. I think several other people have counted too. <br />Ar~body can come to Galtier and count the nine potholes down <br />there. I would like to ask all of the people who are opposed - <br />how many of you are anticipating leaving the neighborhood <br />within the next say five years? I don't know. <br /> <br />WOMAN IN AUDIENCE: We still have to pay for it. <br /> <br />MRS. KING: I realize that. I'm just trying to think - <br />hopefully intelligently - if I'm going to plan to live there <br />for ten or fifteen years - or even for five years - I know - <br />look at the way the economy has been going. I don't want to <br />have to - in three or four or seven years - have to pay two, <br />three or four times this amount to have the street done. I'd <br />rather. pay the money right now - the $800.00. To me that's <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.