My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7621
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7600
>
res_7621
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:18:27 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:18:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7621
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. SS-84-4 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
7/9/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />HONCHELL: No we haven't talked to any land developers. We <br />have laid out several different alternative approaches to land <br />development, which we have shown to the people and discussed <br />several with them. Obviously there are many ways that this land <br />could be developed. <br />One of the reasons this is proposed as stated is because <br />it brings the sewer to those who need it now, brings it in the <br />gravity system, and it brings it in a manner that has a fairly <br />minor intrusion on the edge of the property and it doesn't prevent <br />any style of future development. It allows a number of parcels to <br />be utilized. It is not to say that it is the only way, but we <br />believe it's the best. <br /> <br />STEVE: If you don't bring it in there, you said you can't <br />work off Roselawn because you'd need lift station, where else <br />would you come from? <br /> <br />HONCHELL: We would have to come from the road north (I think <br />Oxford) you would have come southerly from there somehow, and I <br />can't tell you exactly how we would get between the homes or how <br />else we could do it, but that would be the only other location in <br />the area that has enough depth. You have to come south from <br />Shrier to get back in to that general locale. <br /> <br />DEMOS: If you did that, then the one on Shrier would properly <br />be connected and not have any use for it. <br /> <br />HONCHELL: They are already connected. <br /> <br />DEMOS: OK, and then at the back end of Mr. Zittle's property, <br />and they wouldn't have any use for it, so the City would have the <br />same amount involved in crossing the roadway, its looks like a <br />total of 654 instead of 709, almost as many feet to come down and <br />then be uncollectable anyway. <br /> <br />AUDIENCE: Its going to be longer, there's more north - south <br />than east-west. <br /> <br />HONCHELL: It did not seem as available for potential develop- <br />ment along that line, because the cemetery property is extremely <br />unlikely to develop and it simply would not be serving as much <br />land. <br /> <br />DEMOS: Does the Council have any feelings, or anything it <br />would like to say on this? <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER JOHNSON: I am impressed by the fact that there <br />is a real need for this sewer, as its one of the few areas in the <br />City where sewer is not connected. I think the staff recommen- <br />dation is a good compromise. I would favor the deferral until <br />the properties are actually developed as proposed. Also, I would <br />like some sort of adjustment of the normal interest so that we can <br />get around the assessment situation. It seems to me that this is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.