res_7621 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HONCHELL: Subsequently, 3 of the 5 have now signed, saying they do want sanitary sewer service. In some cases, some people are presently having some problems with their sanitary system. We have tried to determine what is the most feasible and best way in the long run to bring sanitary sewers to this area. We looked at the possibility of simply extending the existing sanitary sewer, which is near the corner of Roselawn and Victoria to the east, and it was found that this was technically feasible. However, in doing so we would have to match into the existing elevation of the sanitary sewer because some homes are signifi- cantly lower than the roadway. The home on the far extreme end would also not be able to get gravity service and would have to have lift pumps. We determined that this was a fairly expensive and only a partial solution to the problem. In looking at other alternatives, it was determined that there was potential in this area for future additional develop- ments. Future lands which may wish to have a sanitary sewer ser- vice available to them. Specifically there is about a 4.5 acre site located 1966 Jansburg plus 955, 941, 935, 929 the front and/or rear depending upon how its developed of 1965 and the piece adjacent to that to the west as well. These areas are far greater in size than the typical residential parcel in Roseville and if at some point in the future there were either cul-de-sacs brought in or looping roads built or some other configuration arrived, this land could be divided or used more intensively. Having a facility somewhere in the rear of these parcels or along the side of the larger parcel of 1966 would not only serve the five homes today that don't have sanitary sewer facilities, but it would also provide a means in the future for these other par- cels to have sanitary sewer. Therefore, this is the recommendation as being the most feasible from the staff. As we look at that sewer approach however, it is obvious that some of these parcels are not ready, at least not at this point to make that commitment. Whether they do or do not want the land divided, or if they do want to have their land divided are they in a position to commit whether they want it done immediately. Therefore, as the staff put together this feasibility study, it included all those parcels we described before, either those that don't have a sewer and have an existing structure which are shown in the green on the overhead, or those that would potentially have additional use for sanitary sewer in the future which are shown in the blue on the overhead. When you add all those frontages up, it obviously redu- ces the given assessment grade one parcel. It puts us in the position of not having a need for them all today. Therefore, when the staff put the study together, its recommendations would be only for the green areas that need the sewer as of this moment that would actually be charged an assessment and at such point further in time when the other areas (in blue) find that they need the sewer then they would pay their proportion of the assessment. In the meantime the City would defer those on official