res_7621 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HONCHELL: No, we don't propose to put any roads in until such time as the neighborhood and the owners desire. Right here would be the location in which the road might go. We are proposing that not be constructed until the property owners want it. STEVE: That really wouldn't fit there either Charlie, because on the south side there is a very deep wash and depending upon where you propose to go, there's 4 l/2 acres, you'll have the possibility of eating up that big fat area up there. HONCHELL: There is a possiblility of approximately 13 parcels on that land, of standard size useful lots. Now there's a couple of ways, you could bring cul-de-sacs in, you could come in from the north on the other road somehow, or through one of those other parcels you could bring a cul-de-sac or two in from Chatsworth, or maybe its easier to show than tell you. The other way would be to serve the rear parcels of not only this property, but build some sort of a roadway along this alignment with a u-shpaed back to avoid all the cul-de-sacs and it would also open the rear of these parcels. Now in doing so that would mean another sanitary sewer somewhere but that would be a future project at such time as the people are ready to have it built. If they are not ready to have it built, we'd never build that sewer. STEVE: How deep are those lots to the north of that area? HONCHELL: Three hundred thirty feet, I believe. STRONG: 328 feet. STEVE: They could actually be split. HONCHELL: There is actually more room in the back for splitting, than in these, you will notice however, that there is one lot at 1925 that we aren't recommending to be split in the future because in our opinion it is not deep enough for a standard lot. All the others seems to have adequate depth to allow for normal lot splits, if a road were available. Obviously with no road you can not have a lot split. STEVE: In other words, what you are proposing here is that this be set up with a horeshoe road rather than cul-de-sacs? HONCHELL: Either that or come in this way, and serve these properties and then have a cul-de-sac come off.... or there are variety of ways it could be done. By having the sewer here in "A" it would have the least impact in general on the properties and would allow the most flexibility for where a street might be in the future. "B" would also allow these three parcels including these over here, which are very large, to use the sewer as well either now or in the near future. STEVE: On the east end of the large parcel, is that also a vacant lot?