Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DEMOS: Any other questions from the Council? If you have a <br />statements pro or con or questions to ask at this time, I ask <br />that you corne to the microphone, state your name and address. <br /> <br />DEMOS: Since there are none we will close. <br /> <br />ANDRE: The appropriate action at this time is to adopt a <br />resolution approving this project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Johnson introduced the following resolution and <br /> <br />moved its adoption: <br /> <br />Resolution No. 7633. <br />RESOLUTION ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION <br />OF IMPROVEMENT NO. ST-84-8 <br />AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND <br />SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR UNDER AND PURSUANT <br />TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 429 <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville, <br />Minnesota, that in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota <br />Statutes, Chapter 429, as amended, the Council held a public <br />hearing on the proposed construcion of Improvement No. ST-84-8 <br />consisting of the installation of storm sewer and necessary <br />appurtenances, on all that property in the general area north of <br />County Road B-2, south of Oakcrest Avenue and between Fairview <br />Avenue and Fry Street, as described in the Notice of Hearing, at <br />a cost presently estimated at $440,835.42 and substantially in <br />accordance with the preliminary report as to the feasibility <br />thereof which is now on file in the office of the City Manager; <br />and having considered the views of all interested persons and <br />being fully advised in the premises, the Council does hereby <br />determine and order that said improvement shall be constructed <br />and financed, and special assessments shall be levied therefor, <br />pursuant to said Chapter 429, and that the area proposed to be <br />assessed therefor shall include the property as described in the <br />Notice of Hearing. The City Public Works Director is directed to <br />prepare and submit to the Council the final plans and specifica- <br />tions. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was <br />duly seconded by Kehr and upon roll call vote being taken <br /> <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: All present; <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None; <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />