My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-09-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-09-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2011 3:54:22 PM
Creation date
9/22/2011 3:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
facing this issue; and many cities with even older infrastructure systems had been <br />dealing with it for an even longer time. <br />On a personal note, Chair DeBenedet noted that his initial interest in applying to <br />serve on the PWET Commission, given his career experience, was to personally <br />investigate whether Roseville was doing a good job maintaining its infrastructure <br />systems in the most cost - effective manner; not necessarily the least expensive, but <br />through providing the most value for the longest period of time for taxpayers. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted that these pipe infrastructure systems lasted a long time, <br />between 50 -100 years; and he had originally decided to base his capstone paper <br />for his Master's program on this very issue. Whil <br />initially, Chair DeBenedet noted his paper had <br />project needed to be addressed sooner not la <br />Following his extensive research of th <br />his paper, Chair DeBenedet opined <br />the City was proposing to handle i <br />needs. While preparing his paper, p <br />Miller and Public Works Director Sch <br />initially thought it would <br />While taking into conside <br />management programs to <br />Chair DeBenedet o fined <br />technologies E <br />ling a different idea <br />him to realize that this <br />system, and as part of <br />agreement with how <br />land infrastructure <br />finance Director <br />A Afted that he <br />' in ty (20) years. <br />on projects and asset <br />for the lowest overall cost, <br />- materials and <br />twenty (20) years, if <br />his origi oncerns were whether the City of <br />D,htful a ut i rastructure replacement; no <br />Being pr e d providing good governan <br />th diffic issues and push off those infra <br />i However, Chair DeBenedet opined th <br />that blem with its current elected official <br />ss these CIP needs, with much of the Roseville <br />at an 80 -90 life by the time they're scheduled for <br />eBenedet opined that there was no question that new <br />igies were better and would provide more years, even those <br />Chair DeBenedet advised that he was all in favor of doing this and was more than <br />willing to pay his fare share of the costs. Chair DeBenedet opined that sewer and <br />water services were one of the best utility values received by residents today; and <br />people didn't realize the value of safe water compared to what other countries <br />faced, or what was faced by this country 100 years ago. While recognizing that <br />these seem to massive issues today, Chair DeBenedet noted similar investments <br />made when needed by previous generations, and the need to act similarly today <br />for the benefit of current and future residents and generations. <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.