My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-09-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-09-27_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2011 3:54:22 PM
Creation date
9/22/2011 3:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/27/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. <br />the lowest bid at $850,000 for Phase I, and only $1 million allotted for the entire <br />project. Ms. Bloom advised that staff was now meeting with MnDOT to <br />determine the next steps; whether quantities in the bid document aligned with <br />proposed work; and whether the bid will proceed to award or be rebid as <br />concurred by the various partners (MnDOT, U of MN, Cities of Falcon Heights <br />and Roseville, and Livable Communities Grant funds administered through TLC). <br />Ms. Bloom noted there was a possibility of additional grant funds being available, <br />but it was too soon to tell at this early stage. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted later during the, <br />had provided technical assistance on <br />needs anticipated and pr ' ftver <br />noted that that infrastructu <br />last month's meeting. <br />personnel and variable costs <br />water); and the resulting recom <br />rations as detailed in the report. <br />Department <br />s and their <br />chwartz <br />1 11 <br />sented to the Commission at <br />that the CIP was <br />.d been done, through addressing fixed, <br />ter purchase and treatment of storm <br />of the Task Force for all utility <br />-eviewed the a funding for capital financing over a number of <br />annual funds available and actual annual needs; with the Task <br />levels in line <br />of an impact an <br />identified propo <br />g these one -time significant rate adjustment to bring funding <br />t aital needs for the next twenty (20) years, providing for less <br />than by projecting needs in advance. Mr. Schwartz <br />se rate and use rate impacts. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the City Council and Task Force was asking the PWET <br />Commission if they were supportive of that recommendation; and if not, an <br />alternative recommendation. <br />Mr. Schwartz responded to Commission questions, comments and clarification <br />needs throughout the presentation. <br />Water Operations <br />Page 4 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.