My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7739
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7700
>
res_7739
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:19:17 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:21:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7739
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-85-11 and Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429
Resolution Date Passed
6/10/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />these particular boundaries is Aglen has already been improved <br /> <br />to the north. You may recall that earlier this year the <br /> <br />Council approved the reconstruction of woodhill Drive, the <br /> <br />reconstruction of Oxford and the reconstruction or Judi~h so <br /> <br />that I suppose it's reasonable to assume that these particular <br /> <br />property owners felt that this was the time to dO the rest of <br /> <br />tne neighborhood. I don't know that because I haven't talked <br /> <br />to all of them, but it was signed by d5 percent of the people. <br /> <br />One of the unusual circumstances on this <br /> <br />particular street, there is a very large lot located on the <br /> <br />corner of ~oodhill, which, due to its configuration with the <br /> <br />existing structure, it's our VIew at this point that it is not <br /> <br />dIvidable or splitable. As such, Woodhill is a frontage, <br /> <br />Aglen is the side lot, so it would get so-called side lot <br /> <br />benefits. <br /> <br />If at some point in the future a fire occurred or <br /> <br />something happened so the structure was no longer there ana <br /> <br />the owner processed through the Planning Commission and the <br /> <br />council for some redivision ot the lot, I don't know just how, <br /> <br />then there would be additional charges at that point. But at <br /> <br />this stage we see this as just a very large size lot situation. <br /> <br />DLMOS: Mr. Deans? <br /> <br />DEANS: Mayor and members of the Council, <br /> <br />again, this is an 85 percent petition. The total cost of the <br /> <br />project is $39,l26.61. The total assessable footage is 658.5. <br /> <br />~he cost per assessable foot is $59.42. Of that amount 25 <br /> <br />DOUGHL~T~ & SIGSTAD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.