My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0426_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0426_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2011 12:57:09 PM
Creation date
9/29/2011 12:41:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
149
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> DATE: 01/13/99 <br /> ITEM No: <br /> Department Approval: Manager Approved: Agenda Section: <br /> CONTINUED ITEM <br /> Item Description: Prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing Partners,LLC request <br /> for an Comprehensive Flan amendment (CH and LR to HR) and concept <br /> development plan approval for planned unit development on 8.24 acres <br /> including the existing Prince of Peace Lutheran Church} a 56-unit three- <br /> stoa senior housing building, and an off-street parking area(PF3049). <br /> Update: <br /> On December 9, 1998 the Roseville Planning Conunission held a public hearing on the Prince of <br /> Peace request (PF 3049). The Commission closed the hearing and requested the City Council to <br /> provide more time for project review. The Commission requested staff to provide a review of other <br /> sites in the community that could create a precedent (review is attached). The Commission also <br /> requested the development team to prepare sight-line studies and vegetation analysis(review of some <br /> vie;points is attached). The Church also did a photo inventory of parking overflow on major church <br /> events (review of some view points is attached). The City Manager has followed up on a request by <br /> the Council to determine if there was Church interest in a joint parking lot project. The Church <br /> decided the Joint parking lot was not in their interest (letter is attached). Finally, staff reviewed <br /> Commission and public comment from the hearing and updated some of the facts in the <br /> connmen0indings section, concluding that from a land use perspective, the use is still appropriate, <br /> but a more sophisticated and detailed site and building design would be necessary before this concept <br /> issue reaches the Council. <br /> On December 14, 1 998 the City Council approved an extended review period to March 9, 1999. <br /> 1.0 Requested Action <br /> Prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing Partners, LLC are requesting an <br /> amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to change the future land use designation <br /> of a 6.13 acre parcel from Church to High Density Residential(2561 Victoria Street Nom <br /> - Prince of Peace Lutheran Church) and the designation of a 2.11 acre parcel from Low <br /> Density Residential to High Density Residential (2555 victoria Street North -- Lloyd <br /> Huherty Et Al). prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing Partners,LLC, are <br /> also requesting concept development plan approval on the combined site of 8.24 acres for <br /> a mixed use planned unit development including the existing Prince of Peace Lutheran <br /> Church, a 56-unit three-story senior housing building, and an off-street parking area. <br /> 1.2 A planned unit development is a zoning district which may include single or rnixe d uses, <br /> one or more lots or parcels,and is intended to create a more flexible,creative and efficient <br /> approach to the use of land. In considering proposed planned unit developments,the City <br /> considers all standards and purposes of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to achieve a <br /> maximum coordination between the proposed development and the surrounding uses,the <br /> conservation of woodlands and wetlands, and the protection of health, safety and welfare <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.