My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0125_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0125_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:14:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Based on the size of the Huberty lot,it would be possible to divide the Huberty site into 5 <br /> single family lots with a roadway along one edge,) Adjacent land uses include Central parr <br /> to the south, east, and west. To the north is railroad right-of-gray and County load C. <br /> Further east and south are single family residential areas, and further north across County C <br /> are the Owasso Ballfields and single family residential area. <br /> 2.2 prince of Peace Lutheran Church and Senior Housing Partners, LL , are proposing to <br /> construct a 56-unit three-story senior housing building with underground parking in the <br /> northwest portion of the site. In conjunction with this project, a shared parking area would <br /> be constructed in the southeast portion of the site facing the church's main entrance. <br /> Because of the joint use of the site for both church and senior housing uses, rezoning of the <br /> site is to a mixed use planned Unit Development. Since the highest use is the senior housing <br /> building,the underlying zoning will need to be high density residential (churches are allowed <br /> as a permitted use in most residential zoning districts). The Comprehensive Flan will also <br /> need to be amended to change the future land use designation of the church site from Church <br /> to High Density residential and the Huberty site from Low Density Residential to High <br /> Density Residential. <br /> 2.3 The senior housing facility as proposed includes 56 units on three floors, with a heated <br /> underground parking garage with one space for each unit and an elevator serving each floor. <br /> Combined with surface parking, 71 parking spaces are proposed. The exterior of the building <br /> as proposed is pre-finished lap siding with face brie wainscoting and asphalt shingles. The <br /> building will include a dining/lounge area, a guest morn, and a terrace on the main level. <br /> There will be 12 one-bedroom unit,ranging m size from 748 square feet to 994 square feet, <br /> and 44 and two-bedroom units,ranging in size from 90 square feet to 1342 square feet. All <br /> units will have a deck or patio, as well as a washer and dryer. The selling price per share in <br /> the cooperative will range from $25,000 to S50,000., with the monthly housing expense <br /> ranging from $boo to $1100. <br /> 2.4 The Alarming Commission held a sketch plan review of this request on July 8, 1998. At this <br /> meeting,the overall project was presented and two alternative site plans were reviewed. In <br /> one 'ite plan,the senior housing building was located in the southeast portion of the site. In <br /> the second site plan, the senior housing building was located M' the northwest portion of the <br /> site. The senior building at this time was proposed as a 60-unit four-story building with a <br /> 56 space underground parking garage. The height and bulb of the building were discussed, <br /> as well as the impact of the building on the park and adjacent properties. The Manning <br /> Commission asked for more architectural detail on the structure, a visual analysis that <br /> clarifies the visual impacts of the property on the parr and adjacent properties. The <br /> Manning Commission also expressed a preference for the site plan that placed the <br /> building in the northwest portion of the site and asked the applicant to meet with the <br /> Park and recreation Commission to review the impacts of the project on Central Park, <br /> both pro and con. <br /> 2,5 The parr and Recreation Conunission reviewed the request on August 4, 1998. The <br /> Commission expressed a preference for the site plan that places the senior housing <br /> PF3049-RCA(01/25/99)-Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.