1999_0125_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. in the northwest portion of the site (current proposal). The Commission also expressed concerns with the impact of the structure on the park,the need to retain as much p , existing vegetation as possible, a preference for a shared parking area with the park, and a preference to construct only as many parking church spaces as actually needed at this time. 2.6 The Planning Commission held a second sketch plan review of this request on August 12, 1 998. The plan presented at this meeting showed the senior housing building placed in the northwest corner of the site and reduced the size of the senior building to 56-units and three stories current proposal). . height comparison was also presented which shoved that the oak of the roof of the senior housing building was approximately three feet higher than the main p ea of the church building. The relationship of the building to pathways and the proposed parking lot was also reviewed. 2.7 On December 9, 1998,the Commission requested the developer to provide more line-of-sight analysis. The Commission also requested the staff to analyze whether other similar sites are available in Roseville ille (see the attached memo). 2.8 On December 14,1 998,the City Council requested staff to investigate other options that may be available for the Church and the City to acquire and develop the Church parking lot(see the attached memo to City Manager, Steve arkozy). 2.9 Section 1008 of the City Code outlines the requirements and procedures for a planned unit develo ment} including a planned unit development in shoreland management district, The p property included in this proposal is within the shoreland management district of Bennett P y Lake. Section 1016. 4 outlines additional planned unit development requirements for a planned unit development in a shoreland management district. These standards require a maximum floor area coverage (building footprint) of 30%,n �'rn open space of 50%of the site, and a maxnnunl impervious surface coverage of 5%unless water is retained on site. 3.0 Staff Comment 3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: 1. The Comprehensive Plan designates the church parcel as Church and the residential parcel to the south as Low Density Residential. The Comprehensive flan also includes numerous goals and policies that support the development of a project such as this,which are based on the following vision statement for residential areas Roseville shall he a community with an appropriate balance of attractive, safe, well maintained housing alternatives. These alternatives shall he available without discrimination in appealing, well Dept, crime deterring neighborhoods. Each neighborhood shall have appropriate City services, parks, and open space located in an environment that provides adequate educational,occupational,and spiritual opportunities. PF3049-RCA(01/25/99)-Page 4 cf 7