My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1999_0125_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1999
>
1999_0125_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2011 11:31:39 AM
Creation date
9/30/2011 11:14:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
umu <br /> on the street along the north side of the building. <br /> 3.10. The project will have minimal traffic impacts on the surrounding roadways. Estimates are. <br /> that 4 trips per employee per day will generate between 80 and 100 total trips per day. Both <br /> County Road D and Fairview Avenues have approximately 9,000 trips per day and will grow <br /> to nearly 12,000 by the year 2010. <br /> 3.11. The project as proposed is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's <br /> Comprehensive Flan and Title 10 of the City Code (Zoning). <br /> 3,1 2. The proposed project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare. <br /> 4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 4.1 Based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of this report, staff recommends approval of the <br /> concept development plan for a 4,000 to 5,000 s.f.`office building planned unit development <br /> at the southeast corner of the intersection of County Road D and Fairview Avenue. <br /> 5,0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMIENDATIONS <br /> I. <br /> On January 13, 1999, The Flammng Commission held the required hearing and received <br /> comment from the public. After discussion of the issues (see attached excerpt from the <br /> draft minutes) and comments primarily from adjoining property owners David and Dan <br /> eaber g and Barbara wood, 3092 Fairview,the Planning Commission recommended <br /> approval of the proposal (7-0), citing the comments and findings in Section 3 and the <br /> recommendation in Section 4 of this report and noting the effective date of the PUD <br /> would not occur until after publication of the PUD ordinance. Chair Katie Harms <br /> requested the application to hold a second neighborhood meeting because only three <br /> neighbors attended the first meeting. <br /> 6.0 SUGGESTED ACTION <br /> 6.1 By notion, approve the concept development plan for a 4,000 to 5,000 s.f} office building <br /> tanned unit development at the southeast corner of the Intersection of County Road D and <br /> Fan-view Avenue,based on the findings outlined in Section 3 of the report. It is understood <br /> that the effective date of such a planned unit development will not occur until after the <br /> submission and approval of the vacation of the needed portion of County Road D; and, after <br /> the submission and final approval of the planned unit development agreement and <br /> publication of the PUD ordinance.No new construction may occur before the effective date <br /> of the ordinance. <br /> Attachments:Location map;site Plans,Photos of Shoreview Project Engineering Report,Excerpt from PC Draft rninutes 1/13!99 <br /> Prepared by: Dennis Welsch,Community Development Director(490-2232) <br /> Q:1Planning Files\309 Cox\ CA(012599).doe <br /> Application Deadyines:Accepted December 14, 1999;Concept Approval Decision mate:February 14, 1999}Final Approvals Date depend on <br /> complete submission date.vacation is not subject to 60 day requirement. <br /> FF3092—RCA(01125/99)-Page 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.