Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF <br /> JANUARY 13, 1999 <br /> Planning File 3092 RIC co - OFFICE P.U.D.AND VACATION OF PARTUL <br /> RIGHT-OF-WAY AT S.F. CORNER FAIRVIEW AND CO-RD.D <br /> 6a. Plan .ing File 3092. Ric cox is requesting concept development plan <br /> pp approval for planned unit development to allow the redevelopment and <br /> expansion of an existing commercial use. The applicant is also requesting <br /> vacation of the southern 12 feet of county Road D west to allow the addition to <br /> an existing structure}which is located partially within the right-of-way of <br /> county Road D west. The property is located at 3116 Fairview Avenue North <br /> (Co. Rd.D west and Fairview Ave. No.) <br /> Chair Harms opened the hearing.Dennis Welsch explained the project as per <br /> the staff report of January 13, 1 <br /> Member Olson asked about impervious surface (70%approximate); She asked <br /> for the right-of-way vacation location dimensions. <br /> Member Wilke asked if curbs would be matched(rofled asphalt curb). <br /> Chair Harms asked if comments had been received from Arden Hills and the <br /> County.Deb Bloom explained the communication with Arden Hills. <br /> David Seaberg,adjacent duplex property owner,stated he was concerned about <br /> coverage of land and drainage to the site from his property. There is water <br /> standing in this location during the year. The spacing is difficult. The building <br /> is on the right-of-way. He explained the dedications he was required to provide <br /> in the past for residential subdivisions. He noted that no access could be <br /> provided from Fairview Avenue.He expressed concern about the setback and <br /> meeting the current city codes for a b-3 zone.. <br /> He expressed concern about location of the entry.The old oak's would not <br /> survive. He complained about the surface of the road pavement(poor). He <br /> asked that the night-of-way be vacated in front of his property also.There is no <br /> setback match with parcels to the south,especially on the corner lot. There is <br /> not room to do this on a 15,000s.f.lot. The building does not ft. <br /> Member Klausing asked what is the problem with a setback different than those <br /> in area. The Cornerstone concept brings the building closer to corner:and more <br /> human scale. Seaberg said this would create a blind corner-the old building <br /> does not ju'stif'y a new building. <br /> No additional comments were offered. <br />