Laserfiche WebLink
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING NIN COMMISSION INUTE OF 8112198. <br /> 6b. Planning File 3036. John and Moneil Jakel are requesting variances to <br /> reduce the front yard setback of an accessory building to 13 feet and <br /> increase the coverage of the required rear yard from 5% to 38.4% for the <br /> purpose of constructing a 4' 36" (864 sf) garage at 3170 West Owasso <br /> Boulevard. <br /> Chair Harms opened the public hearing and requested Dennis Welsch to present <br /> a summary, based on written reports dated July g, 1998, of the request for <br /> variances. Dennis Welsch advised the purpose of thia variance request was to <br /> replace an existing garage; this site had two frontages and no rear setback <br /> because of the lake; the new garage would be an improvement to the site; that a <br /> front yard variance would be 17', building size variance would be 301.5 square <br /> feet, lot coverag ewo u Id expand to 38% instead of 25%; that s i d eyard setbacks <br /> would be met and that topography was a big issue in the variance request. <br /> Member Mulder asked if asphalt driveway would be replaced (yes with temporary <br /> pavement now). <br /> Member Mulder asked if the garage could be placed to the other side; Mr. Jakel <br /> advised it could but this placement world block the neighbor's view of the lake. <br /> An oak tree would be removed. <br /> Motion: Member Mulder moved, Member pausing seconded, to recommend <br /> approval of.John and Monell Jakel's request for variances to reduce the front <br /> yard setback to 13 feet, to allow the placement of an accessory building in the <br /> front yard area of a lakeshore parcel, and to increase the lot coverage to 38.4% <br /> of the required rear yardfo r the purpose of constructing a 4' x 36' (864 square <br /> foot) replacement garage at 3170 West Owasso Boulevard, based on the <br /> following findings: <br /> 1 Setion 1004.02D (4) requires a front-yard setback, of no less than 30 feet. <br /> Because of the topography of the parcel, a garage is needed up by the <br /> roadway. Meeting the 30 foot setbck requirement would require extensive <br /> filling on a lakeshore lot, which would affect the drainage on this property <br /> and adjacent properties. The proposed garage will be setback 1 feet <br /> from the front property line. <br /> 2. Section 1004.01 (A) requires accessory buildings to be placed in the rear <br /> yard. Since this property is a lakeshore lot, it does not have a true rear <br /> yard. The roadway side of the parcel is classified as a front yard and the <br /> lakeshore side of the parcel is subject to the city's shoreland setback <br /> requirements. <br /> Section 1004.01 (A) also limits the size of an accessory building to % of <br />