My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0824_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0824_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2011 3:08:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2011 2:45:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
public health, safety, or general welfare. The addition will be at the rear of <br /> the property in area that is now a secluded and wooded area. The <br /> construction of the addition will eliminate a location for youth to gather. <br /> Drainage will be directed to the front of the building away from adjacent <br /> properties and construction easements will be required. <br /> 3. The substandard size of the parcel (22,500 square feet) and the location of <br /> the existing building on the parcel create a physical hardship for the <br /> applicant, not created by the applicant. 'The interior layout of the building <br /> also presents a practical difficulty for the applicant. <br /> 3.2 In reviewing the request for a sign variance, staff made the following findings: <br /> 1. The proposed setback variance for the replacement sign is not in harmony <br /> with the general purpose and intent of the city's Comprehensive Plan and <br /> Title 10 of the city Code (Zoning). There is adequate area to move back the <br /> sign to a point 15 feet from the front property line without interfering with the <br /> flow of traffic on the site. one parking space will be lost with the replacement <br /> sign at o five foot setback or a 15 foot setback. <br /> 2. The proposed sign variance if granted, may adversely affect the public <br /> health, safety, and general welfare. The proximity of the sign to the right-of- <br /> way may interfere with the traffic light located at the intersection of Lexington <br /> Avenue and Roselawn Avenue. A setback of 15 feet would eliminate the <br /> interference with the traffic light. <br /> 3. The substandard size of the parcel creates a physical hardship for the <br /> applicant. Locating a sign at the required 30 foot setback would place it in <br /> the middle of the drive aisle of the parking lot. <br /> 4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br /> 4.1 Based on the findings outline in Section 3.1, staff recommends approval of the <br /> request for a variance to reduce the rear yard (east) setback to 3 feet and the side <br /> acrd (north) setback to 4.5 feet for the purpose of constructing an addition to an <br /> existing building (within established building lines) at 1930 Lexington Avenue North, <br /> with the following provisions: <br /> The addition must be constructed of materials and sealed or painted to match <br /> those used in the original building and be designed in a manner conforming <br /> to the original architecture and appearance of the existing building. (it may <br /> well be that the applicant repaints the entire building to meet this provision.) <br /> 2. Concrete perimeter curbing must be installed in the front parking area in <br /> accordance with city requirements, as directed during the re-surfacing <br /> PF#3029 -RCA(08/24/98) - Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.