1998_0824_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

developed; however, they have not been adopted �n cornerstone areas have been �ortion b the City ouncil. of the guidelines encourage placing the building closer � ► re en ace, bufferst or parking along side or behind to the street and allowing more � � . . guidelines are being considered by adjoining property owners. the building. such �u� � 2.13 Mr. ' a variance from section 1009 of the pity bode to Johnson is also requesting f Ion sign reduce the front yard setback o a � n to 5 feet for the purpose of upgrading � • the existing pylon sign is located five feet from the an existing sign. The pole for � �]� sin itself extends up to the property line along property line, however, the sign in to use the existing single pale as the Lexington Avenue. Mr. Johnson �s proposing western pole of the new o p ole sign. The proposed near sign will be feet wide in height. The overall heIht of the sin will be and approximately � feet � • The proposed sign will set within a parking stall. approximately 1 feet. p p (A) of the requires.1� ect�on �o��.0�1 i bode a front yard setback of 30 feet, a rear yard setback of 0 feet, and a yard and setback of 10 feet for a parcel in a B- zoning district. ' s five arkir� s aces per 1 o0o sq u re feet of floor area. ect�on 100�.�'�(D) rewire p � p d primarily to storage and aisles are not included in Portions of the building devote p � these calculations. The parking spaces available on the site adequately accommodate the building with the proposed expansion. requirements for signs Chapter 1009 outlines the red u within the community. Pylon signs� and must meet the setback requirements for the district are classified as structu res y •n which they are located. The area of a free-standing sign is limited to 'loo square � fee t and the overall height is limited to 20 feet. he criteria and procedure for considering a variance. Section '101 .� outlines t p 3.0 STAFF COM T building variances, staff made the following findings: .�l In reviewing the request for b � The proposed setback gar lances for the building addition are in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's existing Compre hensive Plan The existing principa and Title �� of the t bode (Zoning). l structure is property setback feet f from the rear line and 4.5 feet from the side property line. The proposed addition' n gill not encroach further into these established • Commission and staff received a letter opposed hu�ld�rr� lines. The Planning and Genevieve McCarthy, dated 8/5/98, to setback variances from claiming that approval of the variance would damage their townhome property by $16,000 to 17,000 (10% of market value) 2. ' variances, if ranted, will not adversely affect the The proposed building � FF# 029- RCA{08!24/98} -Page 4 of 7