My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0824_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0824_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2011 3:08:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2011 2:45:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
238
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
construct the building addition. <br /> 6. The north and east walls of the addition must be fire rated (four hour) with <br /> no openings (windows or doors). The gall must be screened with <br /> vegetation from the residential areas to the east. A plan Has not been <br /> submitted to date. <br /> 7 The exterior storage of equipment being repaired must be brought into <br /> compliance with the City Code (no exterior storage allowed, except for <br /> display areas allowed by 1990 conditional use permit; dumpster is to be <br /> enclosed or placed in the building). <br /> 8. Landscape plan for area next to new addition shall be completed to the <br /> satisfaction of the City staff and Townhome Association. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Ayes: 5 (VVilke, Harms, Olson, Klausing, Mulder) <br /> Nays: 0 <br /> Discussion: <br /> Curb and paving: no ability to solve curb/ ufter. Jay Kennedy advised parking was <br /> updated in 1985, but no curbing was placed on the site. Storm suer is available to <br /> parking lot; no hardship. <br /> Member Wilke: Sidewalk issue. Dedication of dollars for new sidewalk 'in commercial <br /> areas. <br /> Motion: Member Mulder moved, Member pausing seconded, to amend the <br /> motion by deleting the curb on the north side (snowplowing may be a problem) <br /> until such time as parking lot is resurfaced, but curb is required on the crest, <br /> south and east side. <br /> Motion fails. <br /> Ayes: Mulder, Harms <br /> Nays: Olson, bilker Klausing <br /> Discussion: <br /> Member Wilke: Why prolong for ten years? Why not complete at this time? <br /> Member Klausing: Would create a hardship on current owner because of fast owner's <br /> problems. The area of variance request has aesthetically poor vegetation; it would be <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.