Laserfiche WebLink
line, and numerous trees (recently planted to replace trees lost ` <br /> � to oak k r I t) would <br /> need to be removed. Based on these factors, the <br /> ro o ed <br /> Proposed i 1 l best sere <br /> the reeds of the applicants and will have the least on impact adjacent to d�acent propert <br /> owners. There is also a heavily wooded area of both coniferous <br /> and deciduous <br /> trees between the roadway and the proposed location of the ' <br /> garage which will <br /> provide screening of the garage from the roadway. The topography <br /> of the parcel, <br /> the location of the sanitary sever service, the wooded nature of the parcel, <br /> and the location of the house on the property creates � � <br /> . Physical hardship for <br /> the applicant. <br /> 2.3 The proposed detached garage has been designed to match etch the design and <br /> appearance of the house. The roofline of the garage gill' ,Hatch the r <br /> oofline of the <br /> existing house and the exterior finish of t'he a ra a will be <br /> � � m ason ite painted to <br /> ,match the redwood on the house. The existing house does have a tuck-under two <br /> car garage: however, the Martincos would like to convert this area <br /> to living space <br /> in the future. The proposed building does not exceed the <br /> allowable area for an <br /> accessory building on this property. Based on a lot width of 175 feet, the maximum <br /> allowable accessory building area for this lot is 1000 square a re f <br /> � eel. <br /> 2.4 It is the polio of the City of Roseville to encourage reinvestment ment and improvement <br /> of residential properties within the community. <br /> 2.5 It is also the policy of the City of Roseville to issue minor variances when there is <br /> a hardship or practical difficulty, provided the ro ert is locate <br /> p P y din an R-1} Single <br /> Family Residential District, and used for residential ur oses. <br /> p p <br /> 2.6 Section 1004.01(A), City Code, states it no accessory i i <br /> steall be erected or <br /> located in any yard other than the.rear yard." <br /> Section 1004-02(D)(4) rep u i res a front yard setback of no less <br /> than 30 feet. <br /> 3.0 MINOR VARIANCE COMMITTEE <br /> 3.1 The request for the variance included the required application form,rrrrr a sketch of the <br /> property, a written statement from the applicant, and wriften approval <br /> . pp al from the <br /> adjacent property owners affected by the variance cr Merl n <br /> � ]� oggins at 2237 <br /> Cleveland Avenue !North, Charles Mungmann at 2182 Acorn Road, and Elizabeth <br /> Boryczka at 2250 Acorn Road). <br /> 3.2 The Minor Variance Committee reviewed this request on Tuesday, August 4, 1998. <br /> Mr. and Mrs. Martinco were present to review their ro osal and an <br /> p p saver questions. <br /> The Minor variance Commiftee also ,net Mrs. Martinco on site on <br /> August 5, 'I 99 8: <br /> to review the request and discuss alternative locations. The ro`ect w ' <br /> p � as discussed, <br /> t <br /> including the physical hardships present (topography, location of ho use, location of <br /> PF 062-RCA (08/10/98)- Page 2 of 3 <br />