1998_0727packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

L A L j 4 L -D PRODUCTS r. 'S AN L OF PROPOSED SERVICE DESCRIPTIO-N L TA' - nat'lonal r-putatton fe.L- 4!i nL.�co pt TO -)rk produzis. — - 1 -oi an";2M%�Wil to ouc wt Jk A ana I�.- -' H e%,aluate C 4 - % T "S3qanrr1L_",qr Thii Is, We W1 LF�A.N L huhr Ti5CHLER& a C ate" alD r.-)3,rl We bring A ainable. Another part LKMS NC. supportab!e aild ,50C mis , - the, to and data in t�. nal experlise in the ar�I:as of finan 'dera( • troi con;-.I 0 f the quality Cori 71l t Z a R 1W nd use. 0 dr revenue stracjes. la m niai plial Improvernen r su+te w ILI, Anai vsls and economic&. a Beriesda.MO 2081 6 rwth P.1 I cy analyMs- i3W)320-6-WO demographics and go Fax (301)320-4860 methodo I ogle's Me could sevel' ' fiscal irnpacT cal Anargach, There a: �P W al 2. jec�h.Mni cosl-per capita approach. The m3jOr 80,APLp2oidale R-oad The most corwrt-on is the averaaa utilize. ell as geographic LsSuc-s. -3 -5 11mincr as w m.CA 91105-1404 WP with this methodology is that Mask i problern i tkejaet were oi i ii -ded b'V popuLation to derive �18�",90-6170 a,. 1,9-.D-6235 For example, if the parks and recrt;aIlOrl b dicss or where and C W,,)Ule' bC 3rj`.)j10d 10 POPL'Alation 'Lopwgar L per capita figure, this ficrure %P� I 1L L5 SOMCLIMCS used on a 3 approach %,v h'-h 1,424-431- when the new housing IIIurred. Anoihc- st approach. "' f tail IT T- co 's • a co p e r capit regional or sscate bas roach. The Lon evaluation app tan 'ard multipher approach an' proporuona service s 0 ificant dislorttons of the fiscal m siant combination of these methodollaale*-, can of a 1 us d'sadvanta-ges to the methodologies. A Change A� Impacts because of the %tarlo I. ;ed could be very influcnila! -a 4 L Ice st �.Ia-'d factor against a numbeor of the scrV '-ajonaj 0[' state blems wit I h e'.;e in the fizscal findin-as. ._,�n exam- I of .he pro under reter-c r t: cs. approaches is discu3se I 11s6c: incthodol 0'L?V, to r ] appro-acr-, a moLre Under the case study-marlainal I C1 Lhe read for a new park would an :j&ty of parks wou'd -be a' Once open. available capac d i Pmen t. izal costs ',Or land an,,IJ equ be forecasted with the reSUIMS': C3P 'fic A to that park Other releva"t nses would also e ncorporated spect i operatina expe 0 1 s A— is approach, the locallOn of 100 horne. operating costs would also be noted. Under this Impac f a City -ouW have% a siornificantly different apt I in a newly opened up area o 10 %._ %r 0 study-marainal cost approach is infill stwatioti. This case lb those 200 homes were in an e costly. As noted further below, the case more time consurruns and iherefore mor ent 0 h will utilized by TA in this assignM study-muginal cost approac be PROPOSED SERVICES .xND PRODUCTS It ictions :3Lnd two School districts r,11 bxe eight urisd s our nducta understandinor that there IIIII rk ' included as put of fts work effort. The challenge of this SCOPIC Of wO EO CO ginal cost approach and also realistic fiscal impact assessment using fhe casc study-mare el p pre0are a regional ftscal i mpac t as ses i men t to be able to utilize the findings to h J juris-dicr.lon is the ftscal implicanolls of diffurew '",ad The mart' point of interest for each diction Unless a case �audy-rnaxginal cost 6 deve-lopmccit scenarios as III affects chat jur'sd' and/or finarice director approach is uff, zed, it Is highly unh.kcIN' (hat the citv manager, "It "buy nro" th,= TM a ruler interesied parilen wl Araiwc 74—;L1 —�1�CR!