1998_0720.ws_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

6-27-1995 G:AAA1H P 6 TASK 8 Calc-tilate Prototype Fecal Impact Results The previous fiscal ins acc work will have talc u1 dted die ��n�� r s�� r�� r��nl ti n� fiscal ® development for all of the relevant land use activities_ It will reflect a true case study- ;Se of east a This € will usSe the information coliected and calculatc the costs for up to marg its al pp eight land use care oriel on a "snapshot"shot" prototype bm is. As an eampler i l� the case stud�� ar�tnal approach mfl ted an increase to park cap�t� costs over the forecast period of 50o,� and the east Apr increased its population 25,E persons* the per caps to cost will be $ for the parks and community � � � . . n capital costs. An a r riate calculation nie.Ehodology ill utilized for all revenues, rrea.ta� � �� - capital costs and operating expen.%es. The methodolo r will be different in most cases from the per capita-average cost approach to which the current recreadon budget would is dt ided by current population to equal the cost per capita. % w' prepare the fiscal report on up to eicht land use tyres for each eorr unit This report i discuss e will p 1' p the full cost allocation for each prototype iand use: (the avera&e shame of capital costs operattn� revenues b y land. use type) and will he presented on a per unlit basis for residential and a expenses and � � •e ti n of tl�e square foat bans for nonr+esidcndal. r: Appendix to the report will corlta€n a brief dee p cost and ru Ott assumptions R� ue as utilized and modified from the previous ievei of service and cost and p revenue factor memorandum. For each school striet� we � i11 utilize the appropn atc residential sate r es- unity schoo'l disinct. After jTiutually agreed char cs are we wtit p-e are a draft report for each comm- made we will prepare a final report. �Vork r . r: Land Use Prototype Fiscal e i is -port TASK 9 Assist In Regional Fiscal Impact Analysis Activ ins ' �i the council staff to apply the case stud}-marginal cost fiscal impact findings together e w�l work with pp � t t s for each of the corununtue-V schoo l distracts to the Metro Council members w€t}��- e land use prp � Fide a rot in terms �f the overall �seal i rnpaet estin�ates�.of both sccn a6o�- This is in order to pro proxy - � � discussion o the�ierarch of land uses by type. We will provide a technical review likely to include a disc s r'disc sib oii� implications of the findings and will provide a critique of o�the Council staff Pape � p � p .9 d the r r'nr n&tions. Work Product Memoranda as Appropriate- TASK Asst in Review of Non-fiscal Impacts of Growth �_ Vi oL1� L r'�i rl 0�7. 'l fZ in ;the�OUnC it s non-fiscal Lrllp studies c arc O _ topic areas, T and � have worked on several assirrn�e ;s ill which other in, va�ous �p - con id a Lions asides fiscal results Were considered, 'i ds t m experience will he be nefic i al in this L k-. 5 T'[Schler & Associates, inc