Laserfiche WebLink
FROM <br /> �Vork Producr: Nfemo ran as+App roprt axe. <br /> TASK 11 Discuss possible Implementation Strategies <br /> . T ryes to -manaz'in growth, Thcse can tale the Darin <br /> ��� ��� possible �rn�lerne�.tat�or� tech�� � � , <br /> Where are � y• `rn i�� on direct financial ial comporients} land u sc <br /> 91 of incentives or disincentives. ��� � toes �� - <br /> . ` A and � will i be working on this task. C has <br /> ����combination of these a other factors �rariou� <br /> elements eNfaivaLo€i, selection and implementation of <br /> Sri actively involved ire the preparation, - <br /> �� the non-fiscal impacts acts of growth, <br /> �ternadv� development ���n�no • ���h �eY have ex�rti��' <br /> cntal .housing, econo � development �d <br /> • of limited to} seconder physical, environmental,' <br /> including but n � • ' Grande Council of Governments (MRGCOG) <br /> ' t� TA's cur�e�►t�*orb �.� ��i�il� 10 <br /> related irnp • - ` the rearion is ore example of the f irrn s studies <br /> e aluatm the ecouoniic sustainabih; Isu for <br /> on re are a draft of the memorandum on possit�;2 <br /> Pori-fiscal impact issues. � e wl <br /> focusing an a; made we will issue final memorandum. <br /> implementation strate Yes. After mutually aid changes <br /> lVork Prcduct: Possible Implementation Strafe&s MM <br /> TASK 12 presentations of Previous Reports <br /> fiscal results, non-fiscal impacts of growth, <br /> t `teat the corrtpletion. of the fiscal impact report, prototype • <br /> off end that res ntatiorIS l Given to the participating <br /> possible implementation strategies. we rec � � have presentations <br /> and P <br /> . , - f etro council members, ��e ��a�c.. assumed these fires <br /> c <br /> onunumne.q, liaison co�ttee and M <br /> will occur a maximum of three consecutivc days. <br /> riate Sup <br /> Work Product: presentarlons and ApprOP <br /> n, These may involve additional participation by <br /> � other tasks ��a� a�� iTi 1.ltu�a� �����d Apo f <br /> There r�ria� ., - other f erns who have discussed their sgccialt�edi <br /> the firms <br /> ahead noted. a are willing to work with o _- ti 'ericc <br /> CXperience • Richardson, l�ichlcr and Associates. lnc• ha�'e c�ctens i�� e�pe� <br /> i it.re din corm unity outreach and facilitation <br /> with Nictro-C.oun � <br /> pERFORMANCE <br /> HIM PROPOSED PERIOD OF• s and the re aired period of_performance, we havc <br /> ri previous discussion <br /> with � ourieil � This � ter, he able <br /> based o p e-for rformance, 'his assumes that we iii <br /> lashed what a think is a realistic tirnc f� r icv�rs the <br /> established Service and Cost and Revenue Factor inte <br /> Task-3, Conduct- omrnuriity lv el <br /> of pool <br /> to din T` - �=o moons focusing on rlie ten coi�� un�tteslsc <br /> �,rk in � temr. a ,ucipate having t � . tlic� other <br /> first p <br /> two large communities and the t��o school districts an <br /> districts. one mould word on the �, � consistency aixd in terchange to <br /> aimng six communities. This will enable some cores �' . . , ,. <br /> mould work on the rear time r [ rirr { � � � � � <br /> r i affect a reasonable time period• The <br /> he achieved end ��l ,• F r. ��t�� respective clients. <br /> Caging. This time p <br /> od allows for adequate review o f produ� i- r � <br /> 7ischl r Associates, I��o <br />