My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0622_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0622_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2011 2:15:01 PM
Creation date
10/6/2011 1:54:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Olson asked if a tandem garage would be feasible. Mrs. Hyman stated <br /> it is possible, but inconvenient. (Staff noted that a tandem garage would create a <br /> 40-50 foot long wall along the north property line, clearly visible from adjoining <br /> properties). <br /> Member Klausing asked for location of other supportive four neighbors (rest <br /> side of Chatsworth). <br /> Robert l emn itz, 1730 Chatsworth, the adjoining neighbor to the north, noted that <br /> over 30 years ago he purchased his property for spaciousness. He stated he is <br /> opposed to a variance because of possible damage to sugar maple trees on his <br /> lot which will grow over the proposed garage. The tree roots would be <br /> cut/damaged by the foundation excavation. A power line would require the <br /> maple tree to be inappropriately trimmed. The garage addition would block the <br /> view from the emn its s kitchen window. The snow and water runoff will drain to <br /> the neighboring let. The topography drops one foot in 10 feet to the adjoining <br /> lemnitz lot. The reduced space along the side leaves three feet for <br /> maintenance. If a sidewalk is added, runoff is increased. Mrs.Nyman's rental <br /> occupants also need space to park vehicles, <br /> Mr. T ern nitz has no opposition to a detached or tandem garage. If the variance <br /> is approved, a fence will be installed by lemnitz on his property and no <br /> construction or equipment would be permitted on his site. <br /> Chair Harms asked for details of power lines and runoff. Jay Kennedy explained <br /> that the power lines could be relocated and runoff drained down the driveway. <br /> Member Rhod y asked why the power line would be moved; could NSP allow a <br /> "Mast" on the existing roof. (Typically a power pole is attached to the side of the <br /> house). <br /> Chair Harms asked about limits of tree damage (to the edge of the tree canopy). <br /> She said no north side garage door should be approved on this site; mess <br /> doors could be placed on front or back. <br /> Mrs, Nyman asked if city Codes address the growth of trees over property lines <br /> (no). There is no garage door proposed on the north side. She noted that power <br /> line wou Id have to be moved further north on her site, possibly encroaching into <br /> the overhanging trees. <br /> Member Wilke asked if a driveway could be installed to within three feet of <br /> property litre with a variance (yes). <br /> Member Klausing asked for details of the tree damage. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.