My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1998_0526_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1998
>
1998_0526_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2011 12:07:58 PM
Creation date
10/7/2011 11:43:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.5 One of the proposed lots does not have 100 feet of frontage on a public right-of-way <br /> and does not meet the requirements of Section 1007.01(E) or Section 11 03.06(E) <br /> of the City Code. It has not been the policy of the City Council to grant a waiver <br /> from this requirement in the past. <br /> 2.5 section 11 04.04E9 City Code, outlines the procedure for a three parcel or less typo <br /> of minor subdivision. No hearing or Planning Commission review is necessary; <br /> however, a public hearing before the City Council with prior notification of all <br /> properties within 350 feet of the subject property is required. If the request is <br /> approved,the final certificate of survey is reviewed by the Community Development <br /> Director and then recorded with the Ramsey County Recorder. <br /> Section 1007.01(13) states, "lot width shall be measured along the public right-of- <br /> way line and shall not be less than 100 feet in all industrial districts." <br /> Section 11 03.06(E) states that all lots shall abut on a publicly dedicated street. <br /> 6 TAEE COMMENT <br /> 3.1 In reviewing this request, staff made the following findings: <br /> 1. one of the lots created by the proposed minor subd!vision does not have 100 <br /> feet of frontage on a public right-of-way and does not meet the requirements <br /> of section 1007.01(13) or Section 1103.06(E) of the City Code. <br /> 2. The proposed minor subdivision is not in harmony with the general purpose <br /> and intent of the City Ps Comprehensive Plan, Title 10 of the City Code <br /> (Zoning), or Title 11 of the City Code (Subdivisions). <br /> 3. The proposed minor subdivision will adversely affect the pudic health, <br /> safety, or general welfare. <br /> SUGGESEW G1TYQQLffiKL ACMN <br /> 4.1 By motion, deny Hess l line's request for a minor subdivision to subdivide a 3.68 <br /> acres p arcel into two parcels south of county Road C-2, based on the findings <br /> outlined in soon 3.1 of this report. <br /> Attachments:Location/notification map;notice of public hearing notice;proposed subdivision of property;legal <br /> descriptions of existing and proposed parcels. <br /> 60-clay Time Limit:Application accepted on April 27, 1998; Decision deadline is.June 26, 1998. <br /> Prepared by: Kim L. Lee,AIP(490-2236) <br /> M:\RCATF3020.WPD <br /> P# oo-INCA(05126198)-Page 2 of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.